LegalizeCouncil Decision (CFSP) 2020/1639 of 5 November 2020 establishing the general conditions under which third States could exceptionally be invited to participate in individual PESCO projects
Article 1
Purpose
This Decision lays down the general conditions under which third States could exceptionally be invited to participate in individual PESCO projects.
Article 2
Invitation process
A third State may submit to the coordinator or coordinators of a PESCO project a request to participate in that project. Such request shall contain sufficiently detailed information on the reasons for participating in the project, as well as the scope and form of the proposed participation, in stages of the project if applicable, and shall substantiate the fulfilment of the general conditions set out in Article 3.
Upon receipt of such a request, the participating Member States taking part in the project (‘the project members’) shall assess, on the basis of the information provided by that third State, whether it complies with the general conditions set out in Article 3.
If the project members agree by unanimity:
- (a) that they wish to invite the third State which submitted the request to participate in the project,
- (b) on the scope, the form and, if applicable, the relevant stages of the participation of that third State, and
- (c) that the third State complies with the general conditions set out in Article 3,
the coordinator or coordinators of the project, with the support of the PESCO Secretariat, shall notify the Council and the High Representative accordingly. Such notification shall also include the request submitted by the third State.
Based on the notification referred to in paragraph 3 of this Article, which includes the scope, the form and, if applicable, the relevant stages of the participation of the third State in the project, and following an opinion by the Political and Security Committee, the Council shall take a decision in accordance with Article 46(6) TEU and Article 9(2) of Decision (CFSP) 2017/2315 as to whether the participation of the third State in that project meets the conditions set out in Article 3 of this Decision.
Following a positive decision by the Council as referred to in paragraph 4, the coordinator or coordinators of the PESCO project shall send an invitation to participate in that project to the third State which submitted the request, on behalf of the project members.
Once the third State which submitted the request has informed the coordinator or coordinators of the PESCO project that it accepts the invitation, the project members, or the coordinator or coordinators on their behalf, shall initiate negotiations with that third State with a view to an administrative arrangement to be entered into by the project members, acting unanimously, and that third State, on the basis of the template attached to this Decision. Such administrative arrangement shall ensure consistency with provisions of Decision (CFSP) 2017/2315 and of Decision (CFSP) 2018/909.
The third State invited to participate in a project shall join the project on the date specified in the administrative arrangement referred to in paragraph 6.
The coordinator or coordinators of a PESCO project shall make available to all PESCO participating Member States the administrative arrangements referred to in paragraph 6 of this Article, via the common electronic workspace referred to in Article 2(2) of Decision (CFSP) 2018/909.
Article 3
General conditions
A third State may exceptionally be invited to participate in a PESCO project, and continue to participate, if it fulfils all of the following general conditions:
- (a) it shares the values on which the Union is founded, as laid down in Article 2 TEU, and the principles referred to in Article 21(1) TEU, as well as the objectives of the CFSP in points (a), (b), (c) and (h) of Article 21(2)TEU. It must not contravene the security and defence interests of the Union and its Member States, including respect for the principle of good neighbourly relations with the Member States, and it must have a political dialogue with the Union, which should also cover security and defence aspects when it participates in a PESCO project;
- (b) it provides a substantial added value to the project and contributes to achieving its objectives. In line with the priority of a European collaborative approach, and in accordance with Article 4(5) of Decision (CFSP) 2018/909, the means which it brings into the project must be complementary to those offered by PESCO participating Member States, for example by providing technical expertise or additional capabilities including operational or financial support, thus contributing to the success of the project and hence to the advancement of PESCO;
- (c) its participation contributes to strengthening the Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP) and the Union level of ambition as determined in the Council conclusions of 14 November 2016, including in support of CSDP missions and operations;
- (d) its participation must not lead to dependencies on that third State or to restrictions imposed by it against any Member State of the Union, as regards armament procurement, research and capability development, or on the use and export of arms or capabilities and technology, which would hamper progress or prevent the usability, whether joint or otherwise, the export or the operational deployment of the capability developed in the PESCO project. It must finalise an agreement at an appropriate level on conditions for the further sharing outside the PESCO framework on a case-by-case basis of capabilities and technology to be developed within that project, in order to prevent those capabilities from being used against the Union and its Member States;
- (e) its participation is consistent with the more binding PESCO commitments as specified in the Annex to Decision (CFSP) 2017/2315, in particular those commitments which that PESCO project is helping to fulfil, depending on the specificities of that project. For capability-orientated projects, its participation must also contribute to fulfilling priorities derived from the Capability Development Plan and the Coordinated Annual Review on Defence (CARD), have a positive impact on the European Defence Technological Industrial Base (EDTIB), and make the European defence industry more competitive. In particular, participation by a third State in a project must contribute mainly to the availability, deployability and interoperability of forces;
- (f) it has a Security of Information Agreement with the Union which is in force;
- (g) it has an Administrative Arrangement which has taken effect with the European Defence Agency (EDA) as appropriate, in accordance with Decision (CFSP) 2015/1835, where the project is implemented with the support of the EDA, taking into account the relevant position paper of the EDA ([^E0001]); and
- (h) it has committed itself, in its request for participation referred to in Article 2(1) of this Decision, to ensuring respect for provisions of Decision (CFSP) 2017/2315 and of Decision (CFSP) 2018/909.
Article 4
Rights and obligations of third States participating in a PESCO project
The participation of a third State in a PESCO project shall respect the arrangements concluded by the project members among themselves for the management of the project in accordance with Article 4(1) of Decision (CFSP) 2018/909. A third State participating in a PESCO project shall have the rights and obligations determined in an administrative arrangement as referred to in Article 2(6) of this Decision to be entered into by the project members, acting unanimously, and that third State. Such rights and obligations must respect the general conditions set out in Article 3 of this Decision and may include the following areas:
- (a) attendance by the third State at meetings convened in the framework of the PESCO project;
- (b) roles and responsibilities to be exercised by the third State participating in the PESCO project;
- (c) scope of involvement of the third State in the decision-making process within the PESCO project;
- (d) scope and areas of information-sharing between the project members and the third State participating in the PESCO project.
The invited third State may take part in the decision-making process for the implementation of the project, taking account of its contribution. The arrangements referred to in paragraph 1 shall fully respect the decision-making autonomy of the Union as well as the rights and obligations of the participating Member States, including as regards safeguarding the control of a project and its results within the PESCO framework and decision-making on potential new project members, in accordance with Decision (CFSP) 2017/2315, which establishes PESCO, and with the common set of governance rules for PESCO projects set out in Decision (CFSP) 2018/909.
Article 5
Review mechanism
The coordinator or coordinators of a project in which a third State participates shall communicate to the PESCO Secretariat, in accordance with the procedure and timelines set out in Article 2(2) of Decision (CFSP) 2018/909, information on the individual contribution to the project by that third State and the fulfilment of its commitments to the project, as well as on its continued fulfilment of the general conditions set out in Article 3 of this Decision.
The information referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article shall be communicated once a year to the Council by the PESCO Secretariat, in the context of the annual report on PESCO by the High Representative to the Council and as part of the consolidated information on the PESCO projects, as referred to in Article 2(2) of Decision (CFSP) 2018/909, to ensure that the Council can effectively exercise its oversight on the projects and act when necessary, including as regards the continued fulfilment by the third State participating in the project of the general conditions set out in Article 3 of this Decision.
Article 6
Termination or suspension of the participation of a third State in a PESCO project
If a third State participating in a PESCO project has communicated to the project members its decision to terminate its participation, such termination shall take effect once the project members and that third State have reached agreement on the conditions under which the termination will take place.
Where the participation of a third State in a PESCO project is terminated, the coordinator or coordinators of the project, with the support of the PESCO Secretariat, shall inform the Council and the High Representative accordingly.
The project members may agree either during or outside the regular review referred to in Article 5 that the participation of a third State in a project should be reassessed. In such a case, that third State shall be informed by the project coordinator or coordinators.
If the project members decide to suspend the participation of a third State in a PESCO project, the coordinator or coordinators of the project with the support of the PESCO Secretariat, shall notify the Council and the High Representative accordingly. Based on this notification and following an opinion by the Political and Security Committee, the Council may decide in accordance with Article 46(6) TEU and Article 9(2) of Decision (CFSP) 2017/2315 to terminate the participation of the third State in the project.
If one or several Member States consider that a third State’s participation in a PESCO project no longer meets the general conditions set out in Article 3 of this Decision, they may refer the issue to the Council. In such case, consultations shall take place between the Member States concerned, namely the project members and the referring Member State or Member States, facilitated by the High Representative. In the framework of those consultations, during which the views of the third State may also be heard, the Member State or Member States having referred the issue to the Council shall provide the High Representative with all necessary information in written form, substantiating the reasons for such referral, and shall indicate to the High Representative what measures could be taken to mitigate the issue. The High Representative and the Member States concerned shall examine together the issue and seek adequate solutions within a period of two months. If, following the completion of the consultations, the Member State or Member States having referred the issue to the Council still consider that the third State’s participation in the PESCO project no longer meets the conditions set out in Article 3 of this Decision, they may request that the Council examine the issue. In such a case, the Member States concerned shall provide the Council with all relevant information. On that basis, the Council, acting in accordance with Article 46(6) TEU, shall discuss and decide on the continuation of the third State’s participation.
The administrative arrangements referred to in Article 2(6) shall determine the conditions under which a third State may terminate its participation in a PESCO project and the conditions under which the project members may decide to suspend the participation of a third State in a PESCO project. Such arrangements shall determine in particular the rights and obligations of, respectively, the project members and the third State whose participation is terminated either by that third State or by the Council or suspended by the project members, including with regard to the financial aspects of such termination or suspension, taxes, intellectual property and other elements relevant for the termination or suspension.
Article 7
Relation to the common set of governance rules for PESCO projects
The conditions and procedures under which entities may be involved in the implementation of PESCO projects are not governed by this Decision save as set out in this Article. Decision (CFSP) 2018/909 shall be reviewed by 31 December 2020, in accordance with the first paragraph of Article 9 thereof, in particular with regard to such conditions and procedures.
Subject to any conditions and procedures regulating the involvement of entities in PESCO projects which may be established pursuant to the review of Decision (CFSP) 2018/909 as referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article:
- (a) entities may be involved in the implementation of PESCO projects after 31 December 2030 only on the basis of contracts concluded or procurement procedures launched by that date;
- (b) entities established in, controlled by or having their executive management structures in a third State which has not been invited pursuant to Article 2(5) to participate in a PESCO project before 31 December 2021 may only become involved in the implementation of PESCO projects after that date if the Council so decides in accordance with Article 46(6) TEU.
Decision (CFSP) 2018/909 shall be applied consistently with this Decision.
When the project members decide on the selection of entities, in accordance with Article 7(1) of Decision (CFSP) 2018/909, they shall take due account of the security and defence interests of the Union and its Member States.
Project members shall ensure full transparency vis-à-vis all participating Member States with regard to the involvement of entities in that project, via the common electronic workspace referred to in Article 2(2) of Decision (CFSP) 2018/909.
If a Member State considers that its or the Union’s security and defence interests may be threatened by the involvement of an entity in the implementation of a PESCO project, it may refer the matter to the Council which may request additional information from the project members, with a view to assessing the situation.
Decision (CFSP) 2018/909 shall be adapted, in accordance with the second paragraph of Article 9 thereof, in order to take account of the general conditions for participation of third States in individual PESCO projects as provided for in this Decision.
Article 8
Review
This Decision shall be reviewed when appropriate and no later than by the end of 2022.
Article 9
Entry into force
This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.
ANNEX
TEMPLATE FOR AN ADMINISTRATIVE ARRANGEMENT BETWEEN THE PROJECT MEMBERS AND A THIRD STATE
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Objectives of the project
- 3.Reasons, scope, form and extent of participation
- 4.Compliance of the third State with the general conditions for participation
- 5.Rights and obligations
- 6.Individual contribution to the project by the third State
- 7.Effective date of participation, duration and review
- 8.Termination or suspension
- 9.Liability
- 10.Security matters, disclosure and use of information
- 11.Settlement of disputes
- 12.Final provisions
[^E0001]: EDA position paper on the requirement for the third States entering PESCO projects to have an Administrative Arrangement with EDA (EDA201911157).
Reading this document does not replace reading the official text published in the Official Journal of the European Union. We assume no responsibility for any inaccuracies arising from the conversion of the original to this format.
This text is published under EUR-Lex's own terms of reuse, not a Legalize or public-domain licence.
EUR-Lex
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu — Source: EUR-Lex (Publications Office of the European Union). Reused under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. Only EU legislation published in the printed Official Journal of the European Union is deemed authentic; consolidated texts are reproduced here for documentation purposes and have been reformatted to Markdown.