Commission Regulation (EU) 2023/1803 of 13 August 2023 adopting certain international accounting standards in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1606/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council (Text with EEA relevance)

Type Regulation
Publication 2023-09-26
Last updated 2026-03-08
State In force
Department European Commission, FISMA
Source EUR-Lex
articles 5
Reform history JSON API
  • C10An entity changing from the equity method to accounting for assets and liabilities shall provide a reconciliation between the investment derecognised, and the assets and liabilities recognised, together with any remaining difference adjusted against retained earnings, at the beginning of the immediately preceding period.
  • C11The initial recognition exception in paragraphs 15 and 24 of IAS 12 does not apply when the entity recognises assets and liabilities relating to its interest in a joint operation.

Transition provisions in an entity’s separate financial statements

  • C12An entity that, in accordance with paragraph 10 of IAS 27, was previously accounting in its separate financial statements for its interest in a joint operation as an investment at cost or in accordance with IFRS 9 shall:
  • (a) derecognise the investment and recognise the assets and the liabilities in respect of its interest in the joint operation at the amounts determined in accordance with paragraphs C7–C9.
  • (b) provide a reconciliation between the investment derecognised, and the assets and liabilities recognised, together with any remaining difference adjusted in retained earnings, at the beginning of the immediately preceding period.
  • C13The initial recognition exception in paragraphs 15 and 24 of IAS 12 does not apply when the entity recognises assets and liabilities relating to its interest in a joint operation in its separate financial statements resulting from applying the transition requirements for joint operations referred to in paragraph C12.

References to the ‘immediately preceding period’

  • C13ANotwithstanding the references to the ‘immediately preceding period’ in paragraphs C2–C12, an entity may also present adjusted comparative information for any earlier periods presented, but is not required to do so. If an entity does present adjusted comparative information for any earlier periods, all references to the ‘immediately preceding period’ in paragraphs C2–C12 shall be read as the ‘earliest adjusted comparative period presented’.
  • C13BIf an entity presents unadjusted comparative information for any earlier periods, it shall clearly identify the information that has not been adjusted, state that it has been prepared on a different basis, and explain that basis.

References to IFRS 9

  • C14If an entity applies this IFRS but does not yet apply IFRS 9, any reference to IFRS 9 shall be read as a reference to IAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement.

Accounting for acquisitions of interests in joint operations

  • C14A Accounting for Acquisitions of Interests in Joint Operations (Amendments to IFRS 11), issued in May 2014, amended the heading after paragraph B33 and added paragraphs 21A, B33A–B33D, C1AA and their related headings. An entity shall apply those amendments prospectively for acquisitions of interests in joint operations in which the activities of the joint operations constitute businesses, as defined in IFRS 3, for those acquisitions occurring from the beginning of the first period in which it applies those amendments. Consequently, amounts recognised for acquisitions of interests in joint operations occurring in prior periods shall not be adjusted.
WITHDRAWAL OF OTHER IFRSS
  • C15This IFRS supersedes the following IFRSs:
  • (a) IAS 31 Interests in Joint Ventures; and
  • (b) SIC-13 Jointly Controlled Entities—Non-Monetary Contributions by Venturers.

INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL REPORTING STANDARD 12

Disclosure of Interests in Other Entities

OBJECTIVE

  • 1

The objective of this IFRS is to require an entity to disclose information that enables users of its financial statements to evaluate:

  • (a) the nature of, and risks associated with, its interests in other entities; and
  • (b) the effects of those interests on its financial position, financial performance and cash flows.
Meeting the objective
  • 2To meet the objective in paragraph 1, an entity shall disclose:
  • (a) the significant judgements and assumptions it has made in determining:
  • (i) the nature of its interest in another entity or arrangement;
  • (ii) the type of joint arrangement in which it has an interest (paragraphs 7–9);
  • (iii) that it meets the definition of an investment entity, if applicable (paragraph 9A); and
  • (b) information about its interests in:
  • (i) subsidiaries (paragraphs 10–19);
  • (ii) joint arrangements and associates (paragraphs 20–23); and
  • (iii) structured entities that are not controlled by the entity (unconsolidated structured entities) (paragraphs 24–31).
  • 3If the disclosures required by this IFRS, together with disclosures required by other IFRSs, do not meet the objective in paragraph 1, an entity shall disclose whatever additional information is necessary to meet that objective.
  • 4An entity shall consider the level of detail necessary to satisfy the disclosure objective and how much emphasis to place on each of the requirements in this IFRS. It shall aggregate or disaggregate disclosures so that useful information is not obscured by either the inclusion of a large amount of insignificant detail or the aggregation of items that have different characteristics (see paragraphs B2–B6).

SCOPE

  • 5This IFRS shall be applied by an entity that has an interest in any of the following:
  • (a) subsidiaries
  • (b) joint arrangements (ie joint operations or joint ventures)
  • (c) associates
  • (d) unconsolidated structured entities.
  • 5AExcept as described in paragraph B17, the requirements in this IFRS apply to an entity's interests listed in paragraph 5 that are classified (or included in a disposal group that is classified) as held for sale or discontinued operations in accordance with IFRS 5 Non-current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations.
  • 6This IFRS does not apply to:
  • (a) post-employment benefit plans or other long-term employee benefit plans to which IAS 19 Employee Benefits applies.
  • (b) an entity's separate financial statements to which IAS 27 Separate Financial Statements applies. However,:
  • (i) if an entity has interests in unconsolidated structured entities and prepares separate financial statements as its only financial statements, it shall apply the requirements in paragraphs 24–31 when preparing those separate financial statements.
  • (ii) an investment entity that prepares financial statements in which all of its subsidiaries are measured at fair value through profit or loss in accordance with paragraph 31 of IFRS 10 shall present the disclosures relating to investment entities required by this IFRS.
  • (c) an interest held by an entity that participates in, but does not have joint control of, a joint arrangement unless that interest results in significant influence over the arrangement or is an interest in a structured entity.
  • (d) an interest in another entity that is accounted for in accordance with IFRS 9 Financial Instruments. However, an entity shall apply this IFRS:
  • (i) when that interest is an interest in an associate or a joint venture that, in accordance with IAS 28 Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures, is measured at fair value through profit or loss; or
  • (ii) when that interest is an interest in an unconsolidated structured entity.

SIGNIFICANT JUDGEMENTS AND ASSUMPTIONS

  • 7

An entity shall disclose information about significant judgements and assumptions it has made (and changes to those judgements and assumptions) in determining:

  • (a) that it has control of another entity, ie an investee as described in paragraphs 5 and 6 of IFRS 10 Consolidated Financial Statements;
  • (b) that it has joint control of an arrangement or significant influence over another entity; and
  • (c) the type of joint arrangement (ie joint operation or joint venture) when the arrangement has been structured through a separate vehicle.
  • 8The significant judgements and assumptions disclosed in accordance with paragraph 7 include those made by the entity when changes in facts and circumstances are such that the conclusion about whether it has control, joint control or significant influence changes during the reporting period.
  • 9To comply with paragraph 7, an entity shall disclose, for example, significant judgements and assumptions made in determining that:
  • (a) it does not control another entity even though it holds more than half of the voting rights of the other entity.
  • (b) it controls another entity even though it holds less than half of the voting rights of the other entity.
  • (c) it is an agent or a principal (see paragraphs B58–B72 of IFRS 10).
  • (d) it does not have significant influence even though it holds 20 per cent or more of the voting rights of another entity.
  • (e) it has significant influence even though it holds less than 20 per cent of the voting rights of another entity.
Investment entity status
  • 9A

When a parent determines that it is an investment entity in accordance with paragraph 27 of IFRS 10, the investment entity shall disclose information about significant judgements and assumptions it has made in determining that it is an investment entity. If the investment entity does not have one or more of the typical characteristics of an investment entity (see paragraph 28 of IFRS 10), it shall disclose its reasons for concluding that it is nevertheless an investment entity.

  • 9BWhen an entity becomes, or ceases to be, an investment entity, it shall disclose the change of investment entity status and the reasons for the change. In addition, an entity that becomes an investment entity shall disclose the effect of the change of status on the financial statements for the period presented, including:
  • (a) the total fair value, as of the date of change of status, of the subsidiaries that cease to be consolidated;
  • (b) the total gain or loss, if any, calculated in accordance with paragraph B101 of IFRS 10; and
  • (c) the line item(s) in profit or loss in which the gain or loss is recognised (if not presented separately).

INTERESTS IN SUBSIDIARIES

  • 10

An entity shall disclose information that enables users of its consolidated financial statements

  • (a) to understand:
  • (i) the composition of the group; and
  • (ii) the interest that non-controlling interests have in the group’s activities and cash flows (paragraph 12); and
  • (b) to evaluate:
  • (i) the nature and extent of significant restrictions on its ability to access or use assets, and settle liabilities, of the group (paragraph 13);
  • (ii) the nature of, and changes in, the risks associated with its interests in consolidated structured entities (paragraphs 14–17);
  • (iii) the consequences of changes in its ownership interest in a subsidiary that do not result in a loss of control (paragraph 18); and
  • (iv) the consequences of losing control of a subsidiary during the reporting period (paragraph 19).
  • 11When the financial statements of a subsidiary used in the preparation of consolidated financial statements are as of a date or for a period that is different from that of the consolidated financial statements (see paragraphs B92 and B93 of IFRS 10), an entity shall disclose:
  • (a) the date of the end of the reporting period of the financial statements of that subsidiary; and
  • (b) the reason for using a different date or period.
The interest that non-controlling interests have in the group’s activities and cash flows
  • 12An entity shall disclose for each of its subsidiaries that have non-controlling interests that are material to the reporting entity:
  • (a) the name of the subsidiary.
  • (b) the principal place of business (and country of incorporation if different from the principal place of business) of the subsidiary.
  • (c) the proportion of ownership interests held by non-controlling interests.
  • (d) the proportion of voting rights held by non-controlling interests, if different from the proportion of ownership interests held.
  • (e) the profit or loss allocated to non-controlling interests of the subsidiary during the reporting period.
  • (f) accumulated non-controlling interests of the subsidiary at the end of the reporting period.
  • (g) summarised financial information about the subsidiary (see paragraph B10).
The nature and extent of significant restrictions
  • 13An entity shall disclose:
  • (a) significant restrictions (eg statutory, contractual and regulatory restrictions) on its ability to access or use the assets and settle the liabilities of the group, such as:
  • (i) those that restrict the ability of a parent or its subsidiaries to transfer cash or other assets to (or from) other entities within the group.
  • (ii) guarantees or other requirements that may restrict dividends and other capital distributions being paid, or loans and advances being made or repaid, to (or from) other entities within the group.
  • (b) the nature and extent to which protective rights of non-controlling interests can significantly restrict the entity’s ability to access or use the assets and settle the liabilities of the group (such as when a parent is obliged to settle liabilities of a subsidiary before settling its own liabilities, or approval of non-controlling interests is required either to access the assets or to settle the liabilities of a subsidiary).
  • (c) the carrying amounts in the consolidated financial statements of the assets and liabilities to which those restrictions apply.
Nature of the risks associated with an entity’s interests in consolidated structured entities
  • 14An entity shall disclose the terms of any contractual arrangements that could require the parent or its subsidiaries to provide financial support to a consolidated structured entity, including events or circumstances that could expose the reporting entity to a loss (eg liquidity arrangements or credit rating triggers associated with obligations to purchase assets of the structured entity or provide financial support).
  • 15If during the reporting period a parent or any of its subsidiaries has, without having a contractual obligation to do so, provided financial or other support to a consolidated structured entity (eg purchasing assets of or instruments issued by the structured entity), the entity shall disclose:
  • (a) the type and amount of support provided, including situations in which the parent or its subsidiaries assisted the structured entity in obtaining financial support; and
  • (b) the reasons for providing the support.
  • 16If during the reporting period a parent or any of its subsidiaries has, without having a contractual obligation to do so, provided financial or other support to a previously unconsolidated structured entity and that provision of support resulted in the entity controlling the structured entity, the entity shall disclose an explanation of the relevant factors in reaching that decision.
  • 17An entity shall disclose any current intentions to provide financial or other support to a consolidated structured entity, including intentions to assist the structured entity in obtaining financial support.
Consequences of changes in a parent’s ownership interest in a subsidiary that do not result in a loss of control
  • 18An entity shall present a schedule that shows the effects on the equity attributable to owners of the parent of any changes in its ownership interest in a subsidiary that do not result in a loss of control.
Consequences of losing control of a subsidiary during the reporting period
  • 19An entity shall disclose the gain or loss, if any, calculated in accordance with paragraph 25 of IFRS 10, and:
  • (a) the portion of that gain or loss attributable to measuring any investment retained in the former subsidiary at its fair value at the date when control is lost; and
  • (b) the line item(s) in profit or loss in which the gain or loss is recognised (if not presented separately).

INTERESTS IN UNCONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES (INVESTMENT ENTITIES)

  • 19AAn investment entity that, in accordance with IFRS 10, is required to apply the exception to consolidation and instead account for its investment in a subsidiary at fair value through profit or loss shall disclose that fact.
  • 19BFor each unconsolidated subsidiary, an investment entity shall disclose:
  • (a) the subsidiary’s name;
  • (b) the principal place of business (and country of incorporation if different from the principal place of business) of the subsidiary; and
  • (c) the proportion of ownership interest held by the investment entity and, if different, the proportion of voting rights held.
  • 19CIf an investment entity is the parent of another investment entity, the parent shall also provide the disclosures in 19B(a)–(c) for investments that are controlled by its investment entity subsidiary. The disclosure may be provided by including, in the financial statements of the parent, the financial statements of the subsidiary (or subsidiaries) that contain the above information.
  • 19DAn investment entity shall disclose:
  • (a) the nature and extent of any significant restrictions (eg resulting from borrowing arrangements, regulatory requirements or contractual arrangements) on the ability of an unconsolidated subsidiary to transfer funds to the investment entity in the form of cash dividends or to repay loans or advances made to the unconsolidated subsidiary by the investment entity; and
  • (b) any current commitments or intentions to provide financial or other support to an unconsolidated subsidiary, including commitments or intentions to assist the subsidiary in obtaining financial support.
  • 19EIf, during the reporting period, an investment entity or any of its subsidiaries has, without having a contractual obligation to do so, provided financial or other support to an unconsolidated subsidiary (eg purchasing assets of, or instruments issued by, the subsidiary or assisting the subsidiary in obtaining financial support), the entity shall disclose:
  • (a) the type and amount of support provided to each unconsolidated subsidiary; and
  • (b) the reasons for providing the support.
  • 19FAn investment entity shall disclose the terms of any contractual arrangements that could require the entity or its unconsolidated subsidiaries to provide financial support to an unconsolidated, controlled, structured entity, including events or circumstances that could expose the reporting entity to a loss (eg liquidity arrangements or credit rating triggers associated with obligations to purchase assets of the structured entity or to provide financial support).
  • 19GIf during the reporting period an investment entity or any of its unconsolidated subsidiaries has, without having a contractual obligation to do so, provided financial or other support to an unconsolidated, structured entity that the investment entity did not control, and if that provision of support resulted in the investment entity controlling the structured entity, the investment entity shall disclose an explanation of the relevant factors in reaching the decision to provide that support.

INTERESTS IN JOINT ARRANGEMENTS AND ASSOCIATES

  • 20

An entity shall disclose information that enables users of its financial statements to evaluate:

  • (a) the nature, extent and financial effects of its interests in joint arrangements and associates, including the nature and effects of its contractual relationship with the other investors with joint control of, or significant influence over, joint arrangements and associates (paragraphs 21 and 22); and
  • (b) the nature of, and changes in, the risks associated with its interests in joint ventures and associates (paragraph 23).
Nature, extent and financial effects of an entity’s interests in joint arrangements and associates
  • 21An entity shall disclose:
  • (a) for each joint arrangement and associate that is material to the reporting entity:
  • (i) the name of the joint arrangement or associate.
  • (ii) the nature of the entity’s relationship with the joint arrangement or associate (by, for example, describing the nature of the activities of the joint arrangement or associate and whether they are strategic to the entity’s activities).
  • (iii) the principal place of business (and country of incorporation, if applicable and different from the principal place of business) of the joint arrangement or associate.
  • (iv) the proportion of ownership interest or participating share held by the entity and, if different, the proportion of voting rights held (if applicable).
  • (b) for each joint venture and associate that is material to the reporting entity:
  • (i) whether the investment in the joint venture or associate is measured using the equity method or at fair value.
  • (ii) summarised financial information about the joint venture or associate as specified in paragraphs B12 and B13.
  • (iii) if the joint venture or associate is accounted for using the equity method, the fair value of its investment in the joint venture or associate, if there is a quoted market price for the investment.
  • (c) financial information as specified in paragraph B16 about the entity’s investments in joint ventures and associates that are not individually material:
  • (i) in aggregate for all individually immaterial joint ventures and, separately,
  • (ii) in aggregate for all individually immaterial associates.
  • 21AAn investment entity need not provide the disclosures required by paragraphs 21(b)–21(c).
  • 22An entity shall also disclose:
  • (a) the nature and extent of any significant restrictions (eg resulting from borrowing arrangements, regulatory requirements or contractual arrangements between investors with joint control of or significant influence over a joint venture or an associate) on the ability of joint ventures or associates to transfer funds to the entity in the form of cash dividends, or to repay loans or advances made by the entity.
  • (b) when the financial statements of a joint venture or associate used in applying the equity method are as of a date or for a period that is different from that of the entity:
  • (i) the date of the end of the reporting period of the financial statements of that joint venture or associate; and
  • (ii) the reason for using a different date or period.
  • (c) the unrecognised share of losses of a joint venture or associate, both for the reporting period and cumulatively, if the entity has stopped recognising its share of losses of the joint venture or associate when applying the equity method.
Risks associated with an entity’s interests in joint ventures and associates
  • 23An entity shall disclose:
  • (a) commitments that it has relating to its joint ventures separately from the amount of other commitments as specified in paragraphs B18–B20.
  • (b) in accordance with IAS 37 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets, unless the probability of loss is remote, contingent liabilities incurred relating to its interests in joint ventures or associates (including its share of contingent liabilities incurred jointly with other investors with joint control of, or significant influence over, the joint ventures or associates), separately from the amount of other contingent liabilities.

INTERESTS IN UNCONSOLIDATED STRUCTURED ENTITIES

  • 24

An entity shall disclose information that enables users of its financial statements:

  • (a) to understand the nature and extent of its interests in unconsolidated structured entities (paragraphs 26–28); and
  • (b) to evaluate the nature of, and changes in, the risks associated with its interests in unconsolidated structured entities (paragraphs 29–31).
  • 25The information required by paragraph 24(b) includes information about an entity’s exposure to risk from involvement that it had with unconsolidated structured entities in previous periods (eg sponsoring the structured entity), even if the entity no longer has any contractual involvement with the structured entity at the reporting date.
  • 25AAn investment entity need not provide the disclosures required by paragraph 24 for an unconsolidated structured entity that it controls and for which it presents the disclosures required by paragraphs 19A–19G.
Nature of interests
  • 26An entity shall disclose qualitative and quantitative information about its interests in unconsolidated structured entities, including, but not limited to, the nature, purpose, size and activities of the structured entity and how the structured entity is financed.
  • 27If an entity has sponsored an unconsolidated structured entity for which it does not provide information required by paragraph 29 (eg because it does not have an interest in the entity at the reporting date), the entity shall disclose:
  • (a) how it has determined which structured entities it has sponsored;
  • (b) income from those structured entities during the reporting period, including a description of the types of income presented; and
  • (c) the carrying amount (at the time of transfer) of all assets transferred to those structured entities during the reporting period.
  • 28An entity shall present the information in paragraph 27(b) and (c) in tabular format, unless another format is more appropriate, and classify its sponsoring activities into relevant categories (see paragraphs B2–B6).
Nature of risks
  • 29An entity shall disclose in tabular format, unless another format is more appropriate, a summary of:
  • (a) the carrying amounts of the assets and liabilities recognised in its financial statements relating to its interests in unconsolidated structured entities.
  • (b) the line items in the statement of financial position in which those assets and liabilities are recognised.
  • (c) the amount that best represents the entity’s maximum exposure to loss from its interests in unconsolidated structured entities, including how the maximum exposure to loss is determined. If an entity cannot quantify its maximum exposure to loss from its interests in unconsolidated structured entities it shall disclose that fact and the reasons.
  • (d) a comparison of the carrying amounts of the assets and liabilities of the entity that relate to its interests in unconsolidated structured entities and the entity’s maximum exposure to loss from those entities.
  • 30If during the reporting period an entity has, without having a contractual obligation to do so, provided financial or other support to an unconsolidated structured entity in which it previously had or currently has an interest (for example, purchasing assets of or instruments issued by the structured entity), the entity shall disclose:
  • (a) the type and amount of support provided, including situations in which the entity assisted the structured entity in obtaining financial support; and
  • (b) the reasons for providing the support.
  • 31An entity shall disclose any current intentions to provide financial or other support to an unconsolidated structured entity, including intentions to assist the structured entity in obtaining financial support.

Appendix A

Defined terms

This appendix is an integral part of the IFRS.

  • income from a structured entity For the purpose of this IFRS, income from a structured entity includes, but is not limited to, recurring and non-recurring fees, interest, dividends, gains or losses on the remeasurement or derecognition of interests in structured entities and gains or losses from the transfer of assets and liabilities to the structured entity.
  • interest in another entity For the purpose of this IFRS, an interest in another entity refers to contractual and non-contractual involvement that exposes an entity to variability of returns from the performance of the other entity. An interest in another entity can be evidenced by, but is not limited to, the holding of equity or debt instruments as well as other forms of involvement such as the provision of funding, liquidity support, credit enhancement and guarantees. It includes the means by which an entity has control or joint control of, or significant influence over, another entity. An entity does not necessarily have an interest in another entity solely because of a typical customer supplier relationship.

Paragraphs B7–B9 provide further information about interests in other entities.

Paragraphs B55–B57 of IFRS 10 explain variability of returns.

  • structured entity An entity that has been designed so that voting or similar rights are not the dominant factor in deciding who controls the entity, such as when any voting rights relate to administrative tasks only and the relevant activities are directed by means of contractual arrangements.

Paragraphs B22–B24 provide further information about structured entities.

The following terms are defined in IAS 27 (as amended in 2011), IAS 28 (as amended in 2011), IFRS 10 and IFRS 11 Joint Arrangements and are used in this IFRS with the meanings specified in those IFRSs:

  • — associate
  • — consolidated financial statements
  • — control of an entity
  • — equity method
  • — group
  • — investment entity
  • — joint arrangement
  • — joint control
  • — joint operation
  • — joint venture
  • — non-controlling interest
  • — parent
  • — protective rights
  • — relevant activities
  • — separate financial statements
  • — separate vehicle
  • — significant influence
  • — subsidiary.

Appendix B

Application guidance

This appendix is an integral part of the IFRS. It describes the application of paragraphs 1–31 and has the same authority as the other parts of the IFRS.

  • B1The examples in this appendix portray hypothetical situations. Although some aspects of the examples may be present in actual fact patterns, all relevant facts and circumstances of a particular fact pattern would need to be evaluated when applying IFRS 12.
AGGREGATION (PARAGRAPH 4)
  • B2An entity shall decide, in the light of its circumstances, how much detail it provides to satisfy the information needs of users, how much emphasis it places on different aspects of the requirements and how it aggregates the information. It is necessary to strike a balance between burdening financial statements with excessive detail that may not assist users of financial statements and obscuring information as a result of too much aggregation.
  • B3An entity may aggregate the disclosures required by this IFRS for interests in similar entities if aggregation is consistent with the disclosure objective and the requirement in paragraph B4, and does not obscure the information provided. An entity shall disclose how it has aggregated its interests in similar entities.
  • B4An entity shall present information separately for interests in:
  • (a) subsidiaries;
  • (b) joint ventures;
  • (c) joint operations;
  • (d) associates; and
  • (e) unconsolidated structured entities.
  • B5In determining whether to aggregate information, an entity shall consider quantitative and qualitative information about the different risk and return characteristics of each entity it is considering for aggregation and the significance of each such entity to the reporting entity. The entity shall present the disclosures in a manner that clearly explains to users of financial statements the nature and extent of its interests in those other entities.
  • B6Examples of aggregation levels within the classes of entities set out in paragraph B4 that might be appropriate are:
  • (a) nature of activities (eg a research and development entity, a revolving credit card securitisation entity).
  • (b) industry classification.
  • (c) geography (eg country or region).
INTERESTS IN OTHER ENTITIES
  • B7An interest in another entity refers to contractual and non-contractual involvement that exposes the reporting entity to variability of returns from the performance of the other entity. Consideration of the purpose and design of the other entity may help the reporting entity when assessing whether it has an interest in that entity and, therefore, whether it is required to provide the disclosures in this IFRS. That assessment shall include consideration of the risks that the other entity was designed to create and the risks the other entity was designed to pass on to the reporting entity and other parties.
  • B8A reporting entity is typically exposed to variability of returns from the performance of another entity by holding instruments (such as equity or debt instruments issued by the other entity) or having another involvement that absorbs variability. For example, assume a structured entity holds a loan portfolio. The structured entity obtains a credit default swap from another entity (the reporting entity) to protect itself from the default of interest and principal payments on the loans. The reporting entity has involvement that exposes it to variability of returns from the performance of the structured entity because the credit default swap absorbs variability of returns of the structured entity.
  • B9Some instruments are designed to transfer risk from a reporting entity to another entity. Such instruments create variability of returns for the other entity but do not typically expose the reporting entity to variability of returns from the performance of the other entity. For example, assume a structured entity is established to provide investment opportunities for investors who wish to have exposure to entity Z’s credit risk (entity Z is unrelated to any party involved in the arrangement). The structured entity obtains funding by issuing to those investors notes that are linked to entity Z’s credit risk (credit-linked notes) and uses the proceeds to invest in a portfolio of risk-free financial assets. The structured entity obtains exposure to entity Z’s credit risk by entering into a credit default swap (CDS) with a swap counterparty. The CDS passes entity Z’s credit risk to the structured entity in return for a fee paid by the swap counterparty. The investors in the structured entity receive a higher return that reflects both the structured entity’s return from its asset portfolio and the CDS fee. The swap counterparty does not have involvement with the structured entity that exposes it to variability of returns from the performance of the structured entity because the CDS transfers variability to the structured entity, rather than absorbing variability of returns of the structured entity.
SUMMARISED FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR SUBSIDIARIES, JOINT VENTURES AND ASSOCIATES (PARAGRAPHS 12 AND 21)
  • B10For each subsidiary that has non-controlling interests that are material to the reporting entity, an entity shall disclose:
  • (a) dividends paid to non-controlling interests.
  • (b) summarised financial information about the assets, liabilities, profit or loss and cash flows of the subsidiary that enables users to understand the interest that non-controlling interests have in the group’s activities and cash flows. That information might include but is not limited to, for example, current assets, non-current assets, current liabilities, non-current liabilities, revenue, profit or loss and total comprehensive income.
  • B11The summarised financial information required by paragraph B10(b) shall be the amounts before inter-company eliminations.
  • B12For each joint venture and associate that is material to the reporting entity, an entity shall disclose:
  • (a) dividends received from the joint venture or associate.
  • (b) summarised financial information for the joint venture or associate (see paragraphs B14 and B15) including, but not necessarily limited to:
  • (i) current assets.
  • (ii) non-current assets.
  • (iii) current liabilities.
  • (iv) non-current liabilities.
  • (v) revenue.
  • (vi) profit or loss from continuing operations.
  • (vii) post-tax profit or loss from discontinued operations.
  • (viii) other comprehensive income.
  • (ix) total comprehensive income.
  • B13In addition to the summarised financial information required by paragraph B12, an entity shall disclose for each joint venture that is material to the reporting entity the amount of:
  • (a) cash and cash equivalents included in paragraph B12(b)(i).
  • (b) current financial liabilities (excluding trade and other payables and provisions) included in paragraph B12(b)(iii).
  • (c) non-current financial liabilities (excluding trade and other payables and provisions) included in paragraph B12(b)(iv).
  • (d) depreciation and amortisation.
  • (e) interest income.
  • (f) interest expense.
  • (g) income tax expense or income.
  • B14The summarised financial information disclosed in accordance with paragraphs B12 and B13 shall be the amounts included in the IFRS financial statements of the joint venture or associate (and not the entity’s share of those amounts). If the entity accounts for its interest in the joint venture or associate using the equity method:
  • (a) the amounts included in the IFRS financial statements of the joint venture or associate shall be adjusted to reflect adjustments made by the entity when using the equity method, such as fair value adjustments made at the time of acquisition and adjustments for differences in accounting policies.
  • (b) the entity shall provide a reconciliation of the summarised financial information disclosed to the carrying amount of its interest in the joint venture or associate.
  • B15An entity may present the summarised financial information required by paragraphs B12 and B13 on the basis of the joint venture’s or associate’s financial statements if:
  • (a) the entity measures its interest in the joint venture or associate at fair value in accordance with IAS 28 (as amended in 2011); and
  • (b) the joint venture or associate does not prepare IFRS financial statements and preparation on that basis would be impracticable or cause undue cost.
  • In that case, the entity shall disclose the basis on which the summarised financial information has been prepared.
  • B16An entity shall disclose, in aggregate, the carrying amount of its interests in all individually immaterial joint ventures or associates that are accounted for using the equity method. An entity shall also disclose separately the aggregate amount of its share of those joint ventures’ or associates’:
  • (a) profit or loss from continuing operations.
  • (b) post-tax profit or loss from discontinued operations.
  • (c) other comprehensive income.
  • (d) total comprehensive income.
  • An entity provides the disclosures separately for joint ventures and associates.
  • B17When an entity's interest in a subsidiary, a joint venture or an associate (or a portion of its interest in a joint venture or an associate) is classified (or included in a disposal group that is classified) as held for sale in accordance with IFRS 5, the entity is not required to disclose summarised financial information for that subsidiary, joint venture or associate in accordance with paragraphs B10–B16.
COMMITMENTS FOR JOINT VENTURES (PARAGRAPH 23(a))
  • B18An entity shall disclose total commitments it has made but not recognised at the reporting date (including its share of commitments made jointly with other investors with joint control of a joint venture) relating to its interests in joint ventures. Commitments are those that may give rise to a future outflow of cash or other resources.
  • B19Unrecognised commitments that may give rise to a future outflow of cash or other resources include:
  • (a) unrecognised commitments to contribute funding or resources as a result of, for example:
  • (i) the constitution or acquisition agreements of a joint venture (that, for example, require an entity to contribute funds over a specific period).
  • (ii) capital-intensive projects undertaken by a joint venture.
  • (iii) unconditional purchase obligations, comprising procurement of equipment, inventory or services that an entity is committed to purchasing from, or on behalf of, a joint venture.
  • (iv) unrecognised commitments to provide loans or other financial support to a joint venture.
  • (v) unrecognised commitments to contribute resources to a joint venture, such as assets or services.
  • (vi) other non-cancellable unrecognised commitments relating to a joint venture.
  • (b) unrecognised commitments to acquire another party’s ownership interest (or a portion of that ownership interest) in a joint venture if a particular event occurs or does not occur in the future.
  • B20The requirements and examples in paragraphs B18 and B19 illustrate some of the types of disclosure required by paragraph 18 of IAS 24 Related Party Disclosures.
INTERESTS IN UNCONSOLIDATED STRUCTURED ENTITIES (PARAGRAPHS 24–31)

Structured entities

  • B21A structured entity is an entity that has been designed so that voting or similar rights are not the dominant factor in deciding who controls the entity, such as when any voting rights relate to administrative tasks only and the relevant activities are directed by means of contractual arrangements.
  • B22A structured entity often has some or all of the following features or attributes:
  • (a) restricted activities.
  • (b) a narrow and well-defined objective, such as to effect a tax-efficient lease, carry out research and development activities, provide a source of capital or funding to an entity or provide investment opportunities for investors by passing on risks and rewards associated with the assets of the structured entity to investors.
  • (c) insufficient equity to permit the structured entity to finance its activities without subordinated financial support.
  • (d) financing in the form of multiple contractually linked instruments to investors that create concentrations of credit or other risks (tranches).
  • B23Examples of entities that are regarded as structured entities include, but are not limited to:
  • (a) securitisation vehicles.
  • (b) asset-backed financings.
  • (c) some investment funds.
  • B24An entity that is controlled by voting rights is not a structured entity simply because, for example, it receives funding from third parties following a restructuring.

Nature of risks from interests in unconsolidated structured entities (paragraphs 29–31)

  • B25In addition to the information required by paragraphs 29–31, an entity shall disclose additional information that is necessary to meet the disclosure objective in paragraph 24(b).
  • B26Examples of additional information that, depending on the circumstances, might be relevant to an assessment of the risks to which an entity is exposed when it has an interest in an unconsolidated structured entity are:
  • (a) the terms of an arrangement that could require the entity to provide financial support to an unconsolidated structured entity (eg liquidity arrangements or credit rating triggers associated with obligations to purchase assets of the structured entity or provide financial support), including:
  • (i) a description of events or circumstances that could expose the reporting entity to a loss.
  • (ii) whether there are any terms that would limit the obligation.
  • (iii) whether there are any other parties that provide financial support and, if so, how the reporting entity’s obligation ranks with those of other parties.
  • (b) losses incurred by the entity during the reporting period relating to its interests in unconsolidated structured entities.
  • (c) the types of income the entity received during the reporting period from its interests in unconsolidated structured entities.
  • (d) whether the entity is required to absorb losses of an unconsolidated structured entity before other parties, the maximum limit of such losses for the entity, and (if relevant) the ranking and amounts of potential losses borne by parties whose interests rank lower than the entity’s interest in the unconsolidated structured entity.
  • (e) information about any liquidity arrangements, guarantees or other commitments with third parties that may affect the fair value or risk of the entity’s interests in unconsolidated structured entities.
  • (f) any difficulties an unconsolidated structured entity has experienced in financing its activities during the reporting period.
  • (g) in relation to the funding of an unconsolidated structured entity, the forms of funding (eg commercial paper or medium-term notes) and their weighted-average life. That information might include maturity analyses of the assets and funding of an unconsolidated structured entity if the structured entity has longer-term assets funded by shorter-term funding.

Appendix C

Effective date and transition

This appendix is an integral part of the IFRS and has the same authority as the other parts of the IFRS.

EFFECTIVE DATE AND TRANSITION
  • C1An entity shall apply this IFRS for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013. Earlier application is permitted.
  • C1A Consolidated Financial Statements, Joint Arrangements and Disclosure of Interests in Other Entities: Transition Guidance (Amendments to IFRS 10, IFRS 11 and IFRS 12), issued in June 2012, added paragraphs C2A–C2B. An entity shall apply those amendments for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013. If an entity applies IFRS 12 for an earlier period, it shall apply those amendments for that earlier period.
  • C1B Investment Entities (Amendments to IFRS 10, IFRS 12 and IAS 27), issued in October 2012, amended paragraph 2 and Appendix A, and added paragraphs 9A–9B, 19A–19G, 21A and 25A. An entity shall apply those amendments for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2014. Early adoption is permitted. If an entity applies those amendments earlier, it shall disclose that fact and apply all amendments included in Investment Entities at the same time.
  • C1C Investment Entities: Applying the Consolidation Exception (Amendments to IFRS 10, IFRS 12 and IAS 28), issued in December 2014, amended paragraph 6. An entity shall apply that amendment for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2016. Earlier application is permitted. If an entity applies that amendment for an earlier period it shall disclose that fact.
  • C1D Annual Improvements to IFRS Standards 2014–2016 Cycle, issued in December 2016, added paragraph 5A and amended paragraph B17. An entity shall apply those amendments retrospectively in accordance with IAS 8 Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2017  ([^E0108]).
  • C1EIFRS 18 Presentation and Disclosure in Financial Statements issued in April 2024 amended paragraph B14. An entity shall apply those amendments when it applies IFRS 18.
  • C2An entity is encouraged to provide information required by this IFRS earlier than annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013. Providing some of the disclosures required by this IFRS does not compel the entity to comply with all the requirements of this IFRS or to apply IFRS 10, IFRS 11, IAS 27 (as amended in 2011) and IAS 28 (as amended in 2011) early.
  • C2AThe disclosure requirements of this IFRS need not be applied for any period presented that begins before the annual period immediately preceding the first annual period for which IFRS 12 is applied.
  • C2BThe disclosure requirements of paragraphs 24–31 and the corresponding guidance in paragraphs B21–B26 of this IFRS need not be applied for any period presented that begins before the first annual period for which IFRS 12 is applied.
REFERENCES TO IFRS 9
  • C3If an entity applies this IFRS but does not yet apply IFRS 9, any reference to IFRS 9 shall be read as a reference to IAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement.

INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL REPORTING STANDARD 13

Fair Value Measurement

OBJECTIVE

  • 1

This IFRS:

  • (a) defines fair value;
  • (b) sets out in a single IFRS a framework for measuring fair value; and
  • (c) requires disclosures about fair value measurements.
  • 2Fair value is a market-based measurement, not an entity-specific measurement. For some assets and liabilities, observable market transactions or market information might be available. For other assets and liabilities, observable market transactions and market information might not be available. However, the objective of a fair value measurement in both cases is the same—to estimate the price at which an orderly transaction to sell the asset or to transfer the liability would take place between market participants at the measurement date under current market conditions (ie an exit price at the measurement date from the perspective of a market participant that holds the asset or owes the liability).
  • 3When a price for an identical asset or liability is not observable, an entity measures fair value using another valuation technique that maximises the use of relevant observable inputs and minimises the use of unobservable inputs. Because fair value is a market-based measurement, it is measured using the assumptions that market participants would use when pricing the asset or liability, including assumptions about risk. As a result, an entity’s intention to hold an asset or to settle or otherwise fulfil a liability is not relevant when measuring fair value.
  • 4The definition of fair value focuses on assets and liabilities because they are a primary subject of accounting measurement. In addition, this IFRS shall be applied to an entity’s own equity instruments measured at fair value.

SCOPE

  • 5

This IFRS applies when another IFRS requires or permits fair value measurements or disclosures about fair value measurements (and measurements, such as fair value less costs to sell, based on fair value or disclosures about those measurements), except as specified in paragraphs 6 and 7.

  • 6The measurement and disclosure requirements of this IFRS do not apply to the following:
  • (a) share-based payment transactions within the scope of IFRS 2 Share-based Payment;
  • (b) leasing transactions accounted for in accordance with IFRS 16 Leases; and
  • (c) measurements that have some similarities to fair value but are not fair value, such as net realisable value in IAS 2 Inventories or value in use in IAS 36 Impairment of Assets.
  • 7The disclosures required by this IFRS are not required for the following:
  • (a) plan assets measured at fair value in accordance with IAS 19 Employee Benefits;
  • (b) retirement benefit plan investments measured at fair value in accordance with IAS 26 Accounting and Reporting by Retirement Benefit Plans; and
  • (c) assets for which recoverable amount is fair value less costs of disposal in accordance with IAS 36.
  • 8The fair value measurement framework described in this IFRS applies to both initial and subsequent measurement if fair value is required or permitted by other IFRSs.

MEASUREMENT

Definition of fair value
  • 9

This IFRS defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.

  • 10Paragraph B2 describes the overall fair value measurement approach.
The asset or liability
  • 11

A fair value measurement is for a particular asset or liability. Therefore, when measuring fair value an entity shall take into account the characteristics of the asset or liability if market participants would take those characteristics into account when pricing the asset or liability at the measurement date. Such characteristics include, for example, the following:

  • (a) the condition and location of the asset; and
  • (b) restrictions, if any, on the sale or use of the asset.
  • 12The effect on the measurement arising from a particular characteristic will differ depending on how that characteristic would be taken into account by market participants.
  • 13The asset or liability measured at fair value might be either of the following:
  • (a) a stand-alone asset or liability (eg a financial instrument or a non-financial asset); or
  • (b) a group of assets, a group of liabilities or a group of assets and liabilities (eg a cash-generating unit or a business).
  • 14Whether the asset or liability is a stand-alone asset or liability, a group of assets, a group of liabilities or a group of assets and liabilities for recognition or disclosure purposes depends on its unit of account. The unit of account for the asset or liability shall be determined in accordance with the IFRS that requires or permits the fair value measurement, except as provided in this IFRS.
The transaction
  • 15

A fair value measurement assumes that the asset or liability is exchanged in an orderly transaction between market participants to sell the asset or transfer the liability at the measurement date under current market conditions.

  • 16

A fair value measurement assumes that the transaction to sell the asset or transfer the liability takes place either:

  • (a) in the principal market for the asset or liability; or
  • (b) in the absence of a principal market, in the most advantageous market for the asset or liability.
  • 17An entity need not undertake an exhaustive search of all possible markets to identify the principal market or, in the absence of a principal market, the most advantageous market, but it shall take into account all information that is reasonably available. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, the market in which the entity would normally enter into a transaction to sell the asset or to transfer the liability is presumed to be the principal market or, in the absence of a principal market, the most advantageous market.
  • 18If there is a principal market for the asset or liability, the fair value measurement shall represent the price in that market (whether that price is directly observable or estimated using another valuation technique), even if the price in a different market is potentially more advantageous at the measurement date.
  • 19The entity must have access to the principal (or most advantageous) market at the measurement date. Because different entities (and businesses within those entities) with different activities may have access to different markets, the principal (or most advantageous) market for the same asset or liability might be different for different entities (and businesses within those entities). Therefore, the principal (or most advantageous) market (and thus, market participants) shall be considered from the perspective of the entity, thereby allowing for differences between and among entities with different activities.
  • 20Although an entity must be able to access the market, the entity does not need to be able to sell the particular asset or transfer the particular liability on the measurement date to be able to measure fair value on the basis of the price in that market.
  • 21Even when there is no observable market to provide pricing information about the sale of an asset or the transfer of a liability at the measurement date, a fair value measurement shall assume that a transaction takes place at that date, considered from the perspective of a market participant that holds the asset or owes the liability. That assumed transaction establishes a basis for estimating the price to sell the asset or to transfer the liability.
Market participants
  • 22

An entity shall measure the fair value of an asset or a liability using the assumptions that market participants would use when pricing the asset or liability, assuming that market participants act in their economic best interest.

  • 23In developing those assumptions, an entity need not identify specific market participants. Rather, the entity shall identify characteristics that distinguish market participants generally, considering factors specific to all the following:
  • (a) the asset or liability;
  • (b) the principal (or most advantageous) market for the asset or liability; and
  • (c) market participants with whom the entity would enter into a transaction in that market.
The price
  • 24

Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction in the principal (or most advantageous) market at the measurement date under current market conditions (ie an exit price) regardless of whether that price is directly observable or estimated using another valuation technique.

  • 25The price in the principal (or most advantageous) market used to measure the fair value of the asset or liability shall not be adjusted for transaction costs. Transaction costs shall be accounted for in accordance with other IFRSs. Transaction costs are not a characteristic of an asset or a liability; rather, they are specific to a transaction and will differ depending on how an entity enters into a transaction for the asset or liability.
  • 26Transaction costs do not include transport costs. If location is a characteristic of the asset (as might be the case, for example, for a commodity), the price in the principal (or most advantageous) market shall be adjusted for the costs, if any, that would be incurred to transport the asset from its current location to that market.
Application to non-financial assets
Highest and best use for non-financial assets
  • 27

A fair value measurement of a non-financial asset takes into account a market participant’s ability to generate economic benefits by using the asset in its highest and best use or by selling it to another market participant that would use the asset in its highest and best use.

  • 28The highest and best use of a non-financial asset takes into account the use of the asset that is physically possible, legally permissible and financially feasible, as follows:
  • (a) A use that is physically possible takes into account the physical characteristics of the asset that market participants would take into account when pricing the asset (eg the location or size of a property).
  • (b) A use that is legally permissible takes into account any legal restrictions on the use of the asset that market participants would take into account when pricing the asset (eg the zoning regulations applicable to a property).
  • (c) A use that is financially feasible takes into account whether a use of the asset that is physically possible and legally permissible generates adequate income or cash flows (taking into account the costs of converting the asset to that use) to produce an investment return that market participants would require from an investment in that asset put to that use.
  • 29Highest and best use is determined from the perspective of market participants, even if the entity intends a different use. However, an entity’s current use of a non-financial asset is presumed to be its highest and best use unless market or other factors suggest that a different use by market participants would maximise the value of the asset.
  • 30To protect its competitive position, or for other reasons, an entity may intend not to use an acquired non-financial asset actively or it may intend not to use the asset according to its highest and best use. For example, that might be the case for an acquired intangible asset that the entity plans to use defensively by preventing others from using it. Nevertheless, the entity shall measure the fair value of a non-financial asset assuming its highest and best use by market participants.
Valuation premise for non-financial assets
  • 31The highest and best use of a non-financial asset establishes the valuation premise used to measure the fair value of the asset, as follows:
  • (a) The highest and best use of a non-financial asset might provide maximum value to market participants through its use in combination with other assets as a group (as installed or otherwise configured for use) or in combination with other assets and liabilities (eg a business).
  • (i) If the highest and best use of the asset is to use the asset in combination with other assets or with other assets and liabilities, the fair value of the asset is the price that would be received in a current transaction to sell the asset assuming that the asset would be used with other assets or with other assets and liabilities and that those assets and liabilities (ie its complementary assets and the associated liabilities) would be available to market participants.
  • (ii) Liabilities associated with the asset and with the complementary assets include liabilities that fund working capital, but do not include liabilities used to fund assets other than those within the group of assets.
  • (iii) Assumptions about the highest and best use of a non-financial asset shall be consistent for all the assets (for which highest and best use is relevant) of the group of assets or the group of assets and liabilities within which the asset would be used.
  • (b) The highest and best use of a non-financial asset might provide maximum value to market participants on a stand-alone basis. If the highest and best use of the asset is to use it on a stand-alone basis, the fair value of the asset is the price that would be received in a current transaction to sell the asset to market participants that would use the asset on a stand-alone basis.
  • 32The fair value measurement of a non-financial asset assumes that the asset is sold consistently with the unit of account specified in other IFRSs (which may be an individual asset). That is the case even when that fair value measurement assumes that the highest and best use of the asset is to use it in combination with other assets or with other assets and liabilities because a fair value measurement assumes that the market participant already holds the complementary assets and the associated liabilities.
  • 33Paragraph B3 describes the application of the valuation premise concept for non-financial assets.
Application to liabilities and an entity’s own equity instruments
General principles
  • 34

A fair value measurement assumes that a financial or non-financial liability or an entity’s own equity instrument (eg equity interests issued as consideration in a business combination) is transferred to a market participant at the measurement date. The transfer of a liability or an entity’s own equity instrument assumes the following:

  • (a) A liability would remain outstanding and the market participant transferee would be required to fulfil the obligation. The liability would not be settled with the counterparty or otherwise extinguished on the measurement date.
  • (b) An entity’s own equity instrument would remain outstanding and the market participant transferee would take on the rights and responsibilities associated with the instrument. The instrument would not be cancelled or otherwise extinguished on the measurement date.
  • 35Even when there is no observable market to provide pricing information about the transfer of a liability or an entity’s own equity instrument (eg because contractual or other legal restrictions prevent the transfer of such items), there might be an observable market for such items if they are held by other parties as assets (eg a corporate bond or a call option on an entity’s shares).
  • 36In all cases, an entity shall maximise the use of relevant observable inputs and minimise the use of unobservable inputs to meet the objective of a fair value measurement, which is to estimate the price at which an orderly transaction to transfer the liability or equity instrument would take place between market participants at the measurement date under current market conditions.

Liabilities and equity instruments held by other parties as assets

  • 37

When a quoted price for the transfer of an identical or a similar liability or entity’s own equity instrument is not available and the identical item is held by another party as an asset, an entity shall measure the fair value of the liability or equity instrument from the perspective of a market participant that holds the identical item as an asset at the measurement date.

  • 38In such cases, an entity shall measure the fair value of the liability or equity instrument as follows:
  • (a) using the quoted price in an active market for the identical item held by another party as an asset, if that price is available.
  • (b) if that price is not available, using other observable inputs, such as the quoted price in a market that is not active for the identical item held by another party as an asset.
  • (c) if the observable prices in (a) and (b) are not available, using another valuation technique, such as:
  • (i) an income approach (eg a present value technique that takes into account the future cash flows that a market participant would expect to receive from holding the liability or equity instrument as an asset; see paragraphs B10 and B11).
  • (ii) a market approach (eg using quoted prices for similar liabilities or equity instruments held by other parties as assets; see paragraphs B5–B7).
  • 39An entity shall adjust the quoted price of a liability or an entity’s own equity instrument held by another party as an asset only if there are factors specific to the asset that are not applicable to the fair value measurement of the liability or equity instrument. An entity shall ensure that the price of the asset does not reflect the effect of a restriction preventing the sale of that asset. Some factors that may indicate that the quoted price of the asset should be adjusted include the following:
  • (a) The quoted price for the asset relates to a similar (but not identical) liability or equity instrument held by another party as an asset. For example, the liability or equity instrument may have a particular characteristic (eg the credit quality of the issuer) that is different from that reflected in the fair value of the similar liability or equity instrument held as an asset.
  • (b) The unit of account for the asset is not the same as for the liability or equity instrument. For example, for liabilities, in some cases the price for an asset reflects a combined price for a package comprising both the amounts due from the issuer and a third-party credit enhancement. If the unit of account for the liability is not for the combined package, the objective is to measure the fair value of the issuer’s liability, not the fair value of the combined package. Thus, in such cases, the entity would adjust the observed price for the asset to exclude the effect of the third-party credit enhancement.

Liabilities and equity instruments not held by other parties as assets

  • 40

When a quoted price for the transfer of an identical or a similar liability or entity’s own equity instrument is not available and the identical item is not held by another party as an asset, an entity shall measure the fair value of the liability or equity instrument using a valuation technique from the perspective of a market participant that owes the liability or has issued the claim on equity.

  • 41For example, when applying a present value technique an entity might take into account either of the following:
  • (a) the future cash outflows that a market participant would expect to incur in fulfilling the obligation, including the compensation that a market participant would require for taking on the obligation (see paragraphs B31–B33).
  • (b) the amount that a market participant would receive to enter into or issue an identical liability or equity instrument, using the assumptions that market participants would use when pricing the identical item (eg having the same credit characteristics) in the principal (or most advantageous) market for issuing a liability or an equity instrument with the same contractual terms.
Non-performance risk
  • 42

The fair value of a liability reflects the effect of non-performance risk. Non-performance risk includes, but may not be limited to, an entity’s own credit risk (as defined in IFRS 7 Financial Instruments: Disclosures). Non-performance risk is assumed to be the same before and after the transfer of the liability.

  • 43When measuring the fair value of a liability, an entity shall take into account the effect of its credit risk (credit standing) and any other factors that might influence the likelihood that the obligation will or will not be fulfilled. That effect may differ depending on the liability, for example:
  • (a) whether the liability is an obligation to deliver cash (a financial liability) or an obligation to deliver goods or services (a non-financial liability).
  • (b) the terms of credit enhancements related to the liability, if any.
  • 44The fair value of a liability reflects the effect of non-performance risk on the basis of its unit of account. The issuer of a liability issued with an inseparable third-party credit enhancement that is accounted for separately from the liability shall not include the effect of the credit enhancement (eg a third-party guarantee of debt) in the fair value measurement of the liability. If the credit enhancement is accounted for separately from the liability, the issuer would take into account its own credit standing and not that of the third party guarantor when measuring the fair value of the liability.
Restriction preventing the transfer of a liability or an entity’s own equity instrument
  • 45When measuring the fair value of a liability or an entity’s own equity instrument, an entity shall not include a separate input or an adjustment to other inputs relating to the existence of a restriction that prevents the transfer of the item. The effect of a restriction that prevents the transfer of a liability or an entity’s own equity instrument is either implicitly or explicitly included in the other inputs to the fair value measurement.

Reading this document does not replace reading the official text published in the Official Journal of the European Union. We assume no responsibility for any inaccuracies arising from the conversion of the original to this format.

This text is published under EUR-Lex's own terms of reuse, not a Legalize or public-domain licence. EUR-Lex
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu — Source: EUR-Lex (Publications Office of the European Union). Reused under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. Only EU legislation published in the printed Official Journal of the European Union is deemed authentic; consolidated texts are reproduced here for documentation purposes and have been reformatted to Markdown.