Investigatory Powers Act 2016

Type Public General Act
Publication 2016-11-29
Last updated 2026-04-07
State In force
Department Statute Law Database
articles Not indexed
Reform history JSON API
  • (3) The person to whom the application is made may issue the warrant only if the person considers that the arrangements made for the purposes of section 129 or (as the case may be) section 191 (safeguards relating to retention and disclosure of material) include specific arrangements for the handling, retention, use and destruction of communications or other items of information that identify sources of journalistic information.

Further provision about warrants

Requirements that must be met by warrants

115
  • (1) A warrant under this Part must contain a provision stating whether it is a targeted equipment interference warrant or a targeted examination warrant.
  • (2) A warrant under this Part must be addressed—
  • (a) in the case of a warrant issued under section 102 or 103, to the head of the intelligence service by whom or on whose behalf the application for the warrant was made;
  • (b) in the case of a warrant issued under section 104, to the Chief of Defence Intelligence;
  • (c) in the case of a warrant issued under section 106 by a law enforcement chief (or by an appropriate delegate in relation to a law enforcement chief), to a person who—
  • (i) is an appropriate law enforcement officer in relation to the law enforcement chief, and
  • (ii) is named or described in the warrant.
  • (3) In the case of a targeted equipment interference warrant which relates to a matter described in the first column of the Table below, the warrant must include the details specified in the second column.
Matter Details to be included in the warrant
Equipment belonging to, used by or in the possession of a particular person or organisation The name of the person or organisation or a description of the person or organisation
Equipment belonging to, used by or in the possession of persons who form a group which shares a common purpose or who carry on, or may carry on, a particular activity A description of the purpose or activity and the name of, or a description of, as many of the persons as it is reasonably practicable to name or describe
Equipment used by or in the possession of more than one person or organisation, where the interference is for the purpose of a single investigation or operation A description of the nature of the investigation or operation and the name of, or a description of, as many of the persons or organisations as it is reasonably practicable to name or describe
Equipment in a particular location A description of the location
Equipment in more than one location, where the interference is for the purpose of a single investigation or operation A description of the nature of the investigation or operation and a description of as many of the locations as it is reasonably practicable to describe
Equipment which is being, or may be, used for the purposes of a particular activity or activities of a particular description A description of the particular activity or activities
Equipment which is being, or may be, used to test, maintain or develop capabilities relating to interference with equipment A description of the nature of the testing, maintenance or development of capabilities
Equipment which is being, or may be, used for the training of persons who carry out, or are likely to carry out, interference with equipment A description of the nature of the training
  • (4) A targeted equipment interference warrant must also describe—
  • (a) the type of equipment which is to be interfered with, and
  • (b) the conduct which the person to whom the warrant is addressed is authorised to take.
  • (5) In the case of a targeted examination warrant which relates to a matter described in the first column of the Table below, the warrant must include the details specified in the second column.
Matter Details to be included in the warrant
A particular person or organisation The name of the person or organisation or a description of the person or organisation
A group of persons who share a common purpose or who carry on or may carry on a particular activity A description of the purpose or activity and the name of, or a description of, as many of the persons as it is reasonably practicable to name or describe
More than one person or organisation, where the interference is for the purpose of a single investigation or operation A description of the nature of the investigation or operation and the name of, or a description of, as many of the persons or organisations as it is reasonably practicable to name or describe
The testing, maintenance or development of capabilities relating to the selection of protected material for examination A description of the nature of the testing, maintenance or development of capabilities
The training of persons who carry out, or are likely to carry out, the selection of protected material for examination A description of the nature of the training

Duration of warrants

116
  • (1) A warrant issued under this Part ceases to have effect at the end of the relevant period (see subsection (2)), unless—
  • (a) it is renewed before the end of that period (see section 117), or
  • (b) it is cancelled or otherwise ceases to have effect before the end of that period (see sections 109 and 125).
  • (2) In this section, “the relevant period”—
  • (a) in the case of an urgent warrant which has not been renewed, means the period ending with the fifth working day after the day on which the warrant was issued;
  • (b) in any other case, means the period of 6 months beginning with—
  • (i) the day on which the warrant was issued, or
  • (ii) in the case of a warrant which has been renewed, the day after the day at the end of which the warrant would have ceased to have effect if it had not been renewed.
  • (3) For the purposes of subsection (2)(a), a warrant is an “urgent warrant” if—
  • (a) the warrant was issued without the approval of a Judicial Commissioner, and
  • (b) the person who decided to issue the warrant considered that there was an urgent need to issue it.

Renewal of warrants

117
  • (1) If the renewal conditions are met, a warrant issued under this Part may be renewed, at any time during the renewal period, by an instrument issued by the appropriate person (see subsection (3)).
  • (2) The renewal conditions are—
  • (a) that the appropriate person considers that the warrant continues to be necessary on any relevant grounds,
  • (b) that the appropriate person considers that the conduct that would be authorised by the renewed warrant continues to be proportionate to what is sought to be achieved by that conduct,
  • (c) that, in the case of a targeted examination warrant, the appropriate person considers that the warrant continues to be necessary to authorise the selection of protected material for examination in breach of the prohibition in section 193(4), and
  • (d) that the decision to renew the warrant has been approved by a Judicial Commissioner.
  • (3) The appropriate person is—
  • (a) in the case of a warrant issued under section 102 or 104, the Secretary of State;
  • (b) in the case of a warrant issued under section 103, a member of the Scottish Government;
  • (c) in the case of a warrant issued under section 106 by a law enforcement chief or by an appropriate delegate in relation to the law enforcement chief, either—
  • (i) the law enforcement chief, or
  • (ii) if the warrant was issued by an appropriate delegate, that person.
  • (4) In subsection (2)(a), “relevant grounds” means—
  • (a) in the case of a warrant issued under section 102, grounds falling within section 102(5),
  • (b) in the case of a warrant issued under section 103, the purpose of preventing or detecting serious crime,
  • (c) in the case of a warrant issued under section 104, the interests of national security,
  • (d) in the case of a warrant issued under section 106(1), the purpose mentioned in section 106(1)(a), or
  • (e) in the case of a warrant issued under section 106(3), the purpose mentioned in section 106(3)(a).
  • (5) “The renewal period” means—
  • (a) in the case of an urgent warrant which has not been renewed, the relevant period;
  • (b) in any other case, the period of 30 days ending with the day at the end of which the warrant would otherwise cease to have effect.
  • (6) The decision to renew a warrant issued under section 102 or 104 must be taken personally by the Secretary of State, and the instrument renewing the warrant must be signed by the Secretary of State.
  • (7) The decision to renew a warrant issued under section 103 must be taken personally by a member of the Scottish Government, and the instrument renewing the warrant must be signed by the person who took that decision.
  • (8) The instrument renewing a warrant issued under section 106 must be signed by the person who renews it.
  • (9) Section 108 (approval of warrants by Judicial Commissioners) applies in relation to a decision to renew a warrant under this Part as it applies in relation to a decision to issue such a warrant (and accordingly any reference in that section to the person who decided to issue the warrant is to be read as a reference to the person who decided to renew it).
  • (10) Sections 111 to 114 (additional safeguards) apply in relation to a decision to renew a warrant under this Part as they apply in relation to a decision to issue such a warrant.
  • (11) In this section—
  • relevant period” has the same meaning as in section 116;
  • urgent warrant” is to be read in accordance with subsection (3) of that section.

Modification of warrants issued by the Secretary of State or Scottish Ministers

118
  • (1) The provisions of a warrant issued under section 102, 103 or 104 may be modified at any time by an instrument issued by the person making the modification.
  • (2) The only modifications which may be made under this section are—
  • (a) adding to the matters to which the warrant relates (see section 101(1) and (2)), by including the details required in relation to that matter by section 115(3) or (5);
  • (b) removing a matter to which the warrant relates;
  • (c) adding (in relation to a matter to which the warrant relates) a name or description to the names or descriptions included in the warrant in accordance with section 115(3) or (5);
  • (d) varying or removing (in relation to a matter to which the warrant relates) a name or description included in the warrant in accordance with section 115(3) or (5);
  • (e) adding to the descriptions of types of equipment included in the warrant in accordance with section 115(4)(a);
  • (f) varying or removing a description of a type of equipment included in the warrant in accordance with section 115(4)(a).
  • (3) But—
  • (a) where a targeted equipment interference warrant relates only to a matter specified in section 101(1)(a), only to a matter specified in section 101(1)(d), or only to both such matters, the details included in the warrant in accordance with section 115(3) may not be modified;
  • (b) where a targeted examination warrant relates only to a matter specified in section 101(2)(a), the details included in the warrant in accordance with section 115(5) may not be modified.
  • (4) The decision to modify the provisions of a warrant must be taken personally by the person making the modification, and the instrument making the modification must be signed by that person.

This is subject to section 120(7).

  • (5) Nothing in this section applies in relation to modifying the provisions of a warrant in a way which does not affect the conduct authorised or required by it.
  • (6) Sections 119 to 122 contain further provision about making modifications under this section.

Persons who may make modifications under section 118

119
  • (1) The persons who may make modifications under section 118 of a warrant are (subject to subsection (2))—
  • (a) in the case of a warrant issued by the Secretary of State under section 102 or 104—
  • (i) the Secretary of State, or
  • (ii) a senior official acting on behalf of the Secretary of State;
  • (b) in the case of a warrant issued by the Scottish Ministers under section 103—
  • (i) a member of the Scottish Government, or
  • (ii) a senior official acting on behalf of the Scottish Ministers.
  • (2) Any of the following persons may also make modifications under section 118 of a warrant, but only where the person considers that there is an urgent need to make the modification—
  • (a) the person to whom the warrant is addressed;
  • (b) a person who holds a senior position in the same public authority as the person mentioned in paragraph (a).

Section 122 contains provision about the approval of modifications made in urgent cases.

  • (3) Subsection (2) is subject to section 120(4) and (5) (special rules where any of sections 111 to 114 applies in relation to the making of a modification under section 118).
  • (4) For the purposes of subsection (2)(b), a person holds a senior position in a public authority if—
  • (a) in the case of any of the intelligence services—
  • (i) the person is a member of the Senior Civil Service or a member of the Senior Management Structure of Her Majesty's Diplomatic Service, or
  • (ii) the person holds a position in the intelligence service of equivalent seniority to such a person;
  • (b) in the case of the Ministry of Defence—
  • (i) the person is a member of the Senior Civil Service, or
  • (ii) the person is of or above the rank of brigadier, commodore or air commodore.

Further provision about modifications under section 118

120
  • (1) A modification, other than a modification removing any matter, name or description, may be made under section 118 only if the person making the modification considers—
  • (a) that the modification is necessary on any relevant grounds (see subsection (2)), and
  • (b) that the conduct authorised by the modification is proportionate to what is sought to be achieved by that conduct.
  • (2) In subsection (1)(a), “relevant grounds” means—
  • (a) in the case of a warrant issued under section 102, grounds falling within section 102(5);
  • (b) in the case of a warrant issued under section 103, the purpose of preventing or detecting serious crime;
  • (c) in the case of a warrant issued under section 104, the interests of national security.
  • (3) Sections 111 to 114 (additional safeguards) apply in relation to the making of a modification to a warrant under section 118, other than a modification removing any matter, name or description, as they apply in relation to the issuing of a warrant.
  • (4) Where section 111 applies in relation to the making of a modification—
  • (a) the modification must be made by the Secretary of State, and
  • (b) the modification has effect only if the decision to make the modification has been approved by a Judicial Commissioner.
  • (5) Where section 112, 113 or 114 applies in relation to the making of a modification—
  • (a) the modification must be made by —
  • (i) the Secretary of State or (in the case of a warrant issued by the Scottish Ministers) a member of the Scottish Government, or
  • (ii) if a senior official acting on behalf of a person within sub-paragraph (i) considers that there is an urgent need to make the modification, that senior official, and
  • (b) except where the person making the modification considers that there is an urgent need to make it, the modification has effect only if the decision to make the modification has been approved by a Judicial Commissioner.
  • (6) In a case where any of sections 111 to 114 applies in relation to the making of a modification, section 108 (approval of warrants by Judicial Commissioners) applies in relation to the decision to make the modification as it applies in relation to a decision to issue a warrant, but as if—
  • (a) the references in subsection (1)(a) and (b) of that section to the warrant were references to the modification, and
  • (b) any reference to the person who decided to issue the warrant were a reference to the person who decided to make the modification.

Section 122 contains provision about the approval of modifications made in urgent cases.

  • (7) If, in a case where any of sections 111 to 114 applies in relation to the making of a modification, it is not reasonably practicable for the instrument making the modification to be signed by the Secretary of State or (as the case may be) a member of the Scottish Government in accordance with section 118(4), the instrument may be signed by a senior official designated by the Secretary of State or (as the case may be) the Scottish Ministers for that purpose.
  • (8) In such a case, the instrument making the modification must contain a statement that—
  • (a) it is not reasonably practicable for the instrument to be signed by the person who took the decision to make the modification, and
  • (b) the Secretary of State or (as the case may be) a member of the Scottish Government has personally and expressly authorised the making of the modification.

Notification of modifications

121
  • (1) As soon as is reasonably practicable after a person makes a modification of a warrant under section 118, a Judicial Commissioner must be notified of the modification and the reasons for making it.
  • (2) But subsection (1) does not apply where—
  • (a) the modification is to remove any matter, name or description included in the warrant in accordance with section 115(3) to (5),
  • (b) the modification is made by virtue of section 119(2), or
  • (c) any of sections 111 to 114 applies in relation to the making of the modification.
  • (3) Where a modification is made by a senior official in accordance with section 119(1) or section 120(5)(a)(ii), the Secretary of State or (in the case of a warrant issued by the Scottish Ministers) a member of the Scottish Government must be notified personally of the modification and the reasons for making it.
  • (4) But subsection (3) does not apply where the modification—
  • (a) is made in accordance with section 119(1), and
  • (b) is to remove any matter, name or description included in the warrant in accordance with section 115(3) to (5).

Approval of modifications under section 118 made in urgent cases

122
  • (1) This section applies where a person makes a modification of a warrant by virtue of section 119(2).
  • (2) This section also applies where—
  • (a) section 112, 113 or 114 applies in relation to the making of a modification under section 118,
  • (b) the person making the modification does so without the approval of a Judicial Commissioner, and
  • (c) the person considered that there was an urgent need to make the modification.
  • (3) The person who made the modification must inform the appropriate person that it has been made.
  • (4) In this section—
  • “the appropriate person” is—in a case falling within subsection (1), a designated senior official, andin a case falling within subsection (2), a Judicial Commissioner;
  • designated senior official” means a senior official who has been designated by the Secretary of State or (in the case of warrants issued by the Scottish Ministers) the Scottish Ministers for the purposes of this section.
  • (5) The appropriate person must, before the end of the relevant period—
  • (a) decide whether to approve the decision to make the modification, and
  • (b) notify the person of the appropriate person's decision.

The relevant period” means the period ending with the third working day after the day on which the modification was made.

  • (6) As soon as is reasonably practicable after a designated senior official makes a decision under subsection (5)—
  • (a) a Judicial Commissioner must be notified of—
  • (i) the decision, and
  • (ii) if the senior official has decided to approve the decision to make the modification, the modification in question, and
  • (b) the Secretary of State or (in the case of a warrant issued by the Scottish Ministers) a member of the Scottish Government must be notified personally of the matters mentioned in paragraph (a)(i) and (ii).
  • (7) If the appropriate person refuses to approve the decision to make the modification—
  • (a) the warrant (unless it no longer has effect) has effect as if the modification had not been made, and
  • (b) the person to whom the warrant is addressed must, so far as is reasonably practicable, secure that anything in the process of being done under the warrant by virtue of that modification stops as soon as possible;

and, in a case falling within subsection (2) above, section 108(5) does not apply in relation to the refusal to approve the decision.

  • (8) In a case where the appropriate person refuses to approve a decision to make a modification of a targeted equipment interference warrant, the appropriate person may authorise further interference with equipment for the purpose of enabling the person to whom the warrant is addressed to secure that anything in the process of being done under the warrant by virtue of the modification stops as soon as possible.
  • (9) If the appropriate person authorises further interference with equipment under subsection (8), the Secretary of State or (in the case of a warrant issued by the Scottish Ministers) a member of the Scottish Government must be notified personally of the authorisation.
  • (10) Nothing in this section affects the lawfulness of—
  • (a) anything done under the warrant by virtue of the modification before the modification ceases to have effect;
  • (b) if anything is in the process of being done under the warrant by virtue of the modification when the modification ceases to have effect—
  • (i) anything done before that thing could be stopped, or
  • (ii) anything done which it is not reasonably practicable to stop.

Modification of warrants issued by law enforcement chiefs

123
  • (1) The provisions of a warrant issued under section 106 by a law enforcement chief, or by an appropriate delegate in relation to that chief, may be modified at any time—
  • (a) by the law enforcement chief, or
  • (b) if the warrant was issued by an appropriate delegate, by that person.
  • (2) The only modifications which may be made under this section are—
  • (a) adding to the matters to which the warrant relates (see section 101(1) and (2)), by including the details required in relation to that matter by section 115(3) or (5);
  • (b) removing a matter to which the warrant relates;
  • (c) adding (in relation to a matter to which the warrant relates) a name or description to the names or descriptions included in the warrant in accordance with section 115(3) or (5);
  • (d) varying or removing (in relation to a matter to which the warrant relates) a name or description included in the warrant in accordance with section 115(3) or (5);
  • (e) adding to the descriptions of types of equipment included in the warrant in accordance with section 115(4)(a);
  • (f) varying or removing a description of a type of equipment included in the warrant in accordance with section 115(4)(a).
  • (3) But where a warrant relates only to a matter specified in section 101(1)(a), only to a matter specified in section 101(1)(d), or only to both such matters, the details included in the warrant in accordance with section 115(3) may not be modified.
  • (4) A modification may be made only if—
  • (a) except in the case of a modification removing any matter, name or description, the person making the modification considers that—
  • (i) the modification is necessary on any relevant grounds (see subsection (5)), and
  • (ii) the conduct authorised by the modification is proportionate to what is sought to be achieved by that conduct, and
  • (b) except where the person making the modification considers that there is an urgent need to make it, the decision to make the modification has been approved by a Judicial Commissioner.
  • (5) In subsection (4)(a), “relevant grounds” means—
  • (a) in the case of a warrant issued under section 106(1), the purpose mentioned in section 106(1)(a);
  • (b) in the case of a warrant issued under section 106(3), the purpose mentioned in section 106(3)(a).
  • (6) The decision to make any modification must be taken personally by the person making the modification, and the instrument making the modification must be signed by that person.
  • (7) Section 108 (approval of warrants by Judicial Commissioners) applies in relation to a decision to make a modification of a warrant issued under section 106 as it applies in relation to a decision to issue such a warrant, but as if—
  • (a) the references in subsection (1)(a) and (b) of that section to the warrant were references to the modification, and
  • (b) any reference to the person who decided to issue the warrant were a reference to the person who decided to make the modification.
  • (8) Sections 111 to 114 (additional safeguards) apply in relation to the making of a modification to a warrant under this section, other than a modification removing any matter, name or description, as they apply in relation to the issuing of a warrant.
  • (9) In the application of section 111 in accordance with subsection (8), subsection (5) is to be read as if for the words from “unless” to the end of the subsection there were substituted “ unless the law enforcement chief believes that the warrant (as modified) would authorise interference only with equipment which would be in Scotland at the time of the making of the modification or which the law enforcement chief believes would be in Scotland at that time ”.
  • (10) Where section 111 applies in relation to the making of a modification to a warrant under this section, subsection (4)(b) of this section has effect in relation to the making of the modification as if the words “except where the person making the modification considers that there is an urgent need to make it” were omitted.
  • (11) Nothing in this section applies in relation to modifying the provisions of a warrant in a way which does not affect the conduct authorised or required by it.

Approval of modifications under section 123 in urgent cases

124
  • (1) This section applies where—
  • (a) a modification is made under section 123 without the approval of a Judicial Commissioner, and
  • (b) the person who made the modification considered that there was an urgent need to make it.
  • (2) The person who made the modification must inform a Judicial Commissioner that it has been made.
  • (3) The Judicial Commissioner must, before the end of the relevant period—
  • (a) decide whether to approve the decision to make the modification, and
  • (b) notify the person of the Judicial Commissioner's decision.

The relevant period” means the period ending with the third working day after the day on which the modification was made.

  • (4) If the Judicial Commissioner refuses to approve the decision to make the modification—
  • (a) the person who issued the warrant must be notified of the refusal,
  • (b) the warrant (unless it no longer has effect) has effect as if the modification had not been made, and
  • (c) the person to whom the warrant is addressed must, so far as is reasonably practicable, secure that anything in the process of being done under the warrant by virtue of that modification stops as soon as possible;

and section 108(5) does not apply in relation to the refusal to approve the decision.

  • (5) In a case where a Judicial Commissioner refuses to approve a decision to make a modification of a targeted equipment interference warrant, the Judicial Commissioner may authorise further interference with equipment for the purpose of enabling the person to whom the warrant is addressed to secure that anything in the process of being done under the warrant by virtue of the modification stops as soon as possible.
  • (6) If the Judicial Commissioner authorises further interference with equipment under subsection (5), the person who issued the warrant must be informed of the authorisation.
  • (7) Nothing in this section affects the lawfulness of—
  • (a) anything done under the warrant by virtue of the modification before the modification ceases to have effect;
  • (b) if anything is in the process of being done under the warrant by virtue of the modification when the modification ceases to have effect—
  • (i) anything done before that thing could be stopped, or
  • (ii) anything done which it is not reasonably practicable to stop.

Cancellation of warrants

125
  • (1) Any of the appropriate persons may cancel a warrant issued under this Part at any time.
  • (2) If any of the appropriate persons considers that—
  • (a) a warrant issued under this Part is no longer necessary on any relevant grounds, or
  • (b) the conduct authorised by a warrant issued under this Part is no longer proportionate to what is sought to be achieved by the conduct,

the person must cancel the warrant.

  • (3) In subsection (2)(a), “relevant grounds” means—
  • (a) in the case of a warrant issued under section 102, grounds falling within section 102(5);
  • (b) in the case of a warrant issued under section 103, the purpose of preventing or detecting serious crime;
  • (c) in the case of a warrant issued under section 104, the interests of national security;
  • (d) in the case of a warrant issued under section 106(1), the purpose mentioned in section 106(1)(a);
  • (e) in the case of a warrant issued under section 106(3), the purpose mentioned in section 106(3)(a).
  • (4) For the purposes of this section, “the appropriate persons” are—
  • (a) in the case of a warrant issued by the Secretary of State under section 102 or 104, the Secretary of State or a senior official acting on behalf of the Secretary of State;
  • (b) in the case of a warrant issued by the Scottish Ministers under section 103, a member of the Scottish Government or a senior official acting on behalf of the Scottish Ministers;
  • (c) in the case of a warrant issued under section 106 by a law enforcement chief or by an appropriate delegate in relation to the law enforcement chief, either—
  • (i) the law enforcement chief, or
  • (ii) if the warrant was issued by an appropriate delegate, that person.
  • (5) Where a warrant is cancelled under this section, the person to whom the warrant was addressed must, so far as is reasonably practicable, secure that anything in the process of being done under the warrant stops as soon as possible.
  • (6) A warrant that has been cancelled under this section may not be renewed.

Implementation of warrants

Implementation of warrants

126
  • (1) In giving effect to a targeted equipment interference warrant, the person to whom it is addressed (“the implementing authority”) may (in addition to acting alone) act through, or together with, such other persons as the implementing authority may require (whether under subsection (2) or otherwise) to provide the authority with assistance in giving effect to the warrant.
  • (2) For the purpose of requiring any person to provide assistance in relation to a targeted equipment interference warrant, the implementing authority may—
  • (a) serve a copy of the warrant on any person whom the implementing authority considers may be able to provide such assistance, or
  • (b) make arrangements for the service of a copy of the warrant on any such person.
  • (3) A copy of a warrant may be served under subsection (2) on a person outside the United Kingdom for the purpose of requiring the person to provide such assistance in the form of conduct outside the United Kingdom.
  • (4) For the purposes of this Act, the provision of assistance in giving effect to a targeted equipment interference warrant includes any disclosure to the implementing authority, or to persons acting on that person's behalf, of material obtained under the warrant.
  • (5) The references in subsections (2) and (3) and sections 127 and 128 to the service of a copy of a warrant include—
  • (a) the service of a copy of one or more schedules contained in the warrant with the omission of the remainder of the warrant, and
  • (b) the service of a copy of the warrant with the omission of any schedule contained in it.

Service of warrants

127
  • (1) This section applies to the service of warrants under section 126(2).
  • (2) A copy of the warrant must be served in such a way as to bring the contents of the warrant to the attention of the person who the implementing authority considers may be able to provide assistance in relation to it.
  • (3) A copy of a warrant may be served on a person outside the United Kingdom in any of the following ways (as well as by electronic or other means of service)—
  • (a) by serving it at the person's principal office within the United Kingdom or, if the person has no such office in the United Kingdom, at any place in the United Kingdom where the person carries on business or conducts activities;
  • (b) if the person has specified an address in the United Kingdom as one at which the person, or someone on the person's behalf, will accept service of documents of the same description as a copy of a warrant, by serving it at that address;
  • (c) by making it available for inspection (whether to the person or to someone acting on the person's behalf) at a place in the United Kingdom (but this is subject to subsection (4)).
  • (4) A copy of a warrant may be served on a person outside the United Kingdom in the way mentioned in subsection (3)(c) only if—
  • (a) it is not reasonably practicable for a copy to be served by any other means (whether as mentioned in subsection (3)(a) or (b) or otherwise), and
  • (b) the implementing authority takes such steps as it considers appropriate for the purpose of bringing the contents of the warrant, and the availability of a copy for inspection, to the attention of the person.
  • (5) The steps mentioned in subsection (4)(b) must be taken as soon as reasonably practicable after the copy of the warrant is made available for inspection.
  • (6) In this section, “the implementing authority” has the same meaning as in section 126.

Duty of telecommunications operators to assist with implementation

128
  • (1) A telecommunications operator that has been served with a copy of a targeted equipment interference warrant issued by the Secretary of State under section 102 or 104, or by the Scottish Ministers under section 103, must take all steps for giving effect to the warrant which are notified to the telecommunications operator by or on behalf of the person to whom the warrant is addressed.
  • (2) A telecommunications operator that has been served with a copy of a targeted equipment interference warrant issued under section 106 and addressed to a law enforcement officer mentioned in subsection (3) must take all steps for giving effect to the warrant which—
  • (a) were approved by the Secretary of State or, in the case of a warrant addressed to a constable of the Police Service of Scotland, by the Scottish Ministers, before the warrant was served, and
  • (b) are notified to the telecommunications operator by or on behalf of the law enforcement officer.
  • (3) The law enforcement officers mentioned in this subsection are—
  • (a) a National Crime Agency officer;
  • (b) an officer of Revenue and Customs;
  • (c) a constable of the Police Service of Scotland;
  • (d) a member of the Police Service of Northern Ireland;
  • (e) a member of the metropolitan police force.
  • (4) The Secretary of State or the Scottish Ministers may give approval for the purposes of subsection (2)(a) if the Secretary of State or (as the case may be) the Scottish Ministers consider that—
  • (a) it is necessary for the telecommunications operator to be required to take the steps, and
  • (b) the steps are proportionate to what is sought to be achieved by them.
  • (5) A telecommunications operator is not required to take any steps which it is not reasonably practicable for the telecommunications operator to take.
  • (6) Where obligations have been imposed on a telecommunications operator (“P”) under section 253 (technical capability notices), for the purposes of subsection (5) the steps which it is reasonably practicable for P to take include every step which it would have been reasonably practicable for P to take if P had complied with all of those obligations.
  • (7) The duty imposed by subsection (1) or (2) is enforceable against a person in the United Kingdom by civil proceedings by the Secretary of State for an injunction, or for specific performance of a statutory duty under section 45 of the Court of Session Act 1988, or for any other appropriate relief.

Supplementary provision

Safeguards relating to retention and disclosure of material

129
  • (1) The issuing authority must ensure, in relation to every targeted equipment interference warrant issued by that authority, that arrangements are in force for securing that the requirements of subsections (2) and (5) are met in relation to the material obtained under the warrant.

This is subject to subsection (10).

  • (2) The requirements of this subsection are met in relation to the material obtained under a warrant if each of the following is limited to the minimum that is necessary for the authorised purposes (see subsection (3))—
  • (a) the number of persons to whom any of the material is disclosed or otherwise made available;
  • (b) the extent to which any of the material is disclosed or otherwise made available;
  • (c) the extent to which any of the material is copied;
  • (d) the number of copies that are made.
  • (3) For the purposes of subsection (2), something is necessary for the authorised purposes if, and only if—
  • (a) it is, or is likely to become, necessary on any relevant grounds (see subsection (7)),
  • (b) it is necessary for facilitating the carrying out of any functions under this Act of the Secretary of State, the Scottish Ministers or the person to whom the warrant is or was addressed,
  • (c) it is necessary for facilitating the carrying out of any functions of the Judicial Commissioners or of the Investigatory Powers Tribunal under or in relation to this Act,
  • (d) it is necessary for the purpose of legal proceedings, or
  • (e) it is necessary for the performance of the functions of any person under any enactment.
  • (4) The arrangements for the time being in force under this section for securing that the requirements of subsection (2) are met in relation to the material obtained under the warrant must include arrangements for securing that every copy made of any of that material is stored, for so long as it is retained, in a secure manner.
  • (5) The requirements of this subsection are met in relation to the material obtained under a warrant if every copy made of any of that material (if not destroyed earlier) is destroyed as soon as there are no longer any grounds for retaining it (see subsection (6)).
  • (6) For the purposes of subsection (5), there are no longer any grounds for retaining a copy of any material if, and only if—
  • (a) its retention is not necessary, or not likely to become necessary, on any relevant grounds (see subsection (7)), and
  • (b) its retention is not necessary for any of the purposes mentioned in paragraphs (b) to (e) of subsection (3) above.
  • (7) In subsections (3) and (6), “relevant grounds” means—
  • (a) in relation to a warrant issued under section 102, grounds falling within section 102(5);
  • (b) in relation to a warrant issued under section 103, the purpose of preventing or detecting serious crime;
  • (c) in relation to a warrant issued under section 104, the interests of national security;
  • (d) in the case of a warrant issued under section 106(1), the purpose mentioned in section 106(1)(a);
  • (e) in the case of a warrant issued under section 106(3), the purpose mentioned in section 106(3)(a).
  • (8) Where—
  • (a) material obtained under a targeted equipment interference warrant is retained, following its examination, for purposes other than the destruction of the material, and
  • (b) it is material that contains confidential journalistic material or identifies a source of journalistic material,

the person to whom the warrant is addressed must inform the Investigatory Powers Commissioner as soon as is reasonably practicable.

  • (9) Subsection (10) applies if—
  • (a) any material obtained under the warrant has been handed over to any overseas authorities, or
  • (b) a copy of any such material has been given to any overseas authorities.
  • (10) To the extent that the requirements of subsections (2) and (5) relate to any of the material mentioned in subsection (9)(a), or to the copy mentioned in subsection (9)(b), the arrangements made for the purpose of this section are not required to secure that those requirements are met (see instead section 130).
  • (11) In this section—
  • copy”, in relation to material obtained under a warrant, means any of the following (whether or not in documentary form)—any copy, extract or summary of the material which identifies the material as having been obtained under the warrant, andany record which is a record of the identities of persons who owned, used or were in possession of the equipment which was interfered with to obtain that material,and “copied” is to be read accordingly;
  • the issuing authority” means—in the case of a warrant issued under section 102 or 104, the Secretary of State;in the case of a warrant issued under section 103, the Scottish Ministers;in the case of a warrant issued under section 106, the law enforcement chief who issued the warrant (or on whose behalf it was issued);
  • overseas authorities” means authorities of a country or territory outside the United Kingdom.

Safeguards relating to disclosure of material overseas

130
  • (1) The issuing authority must ensure, in relation to every targeted equipment interference warrant, that arrangements are in force for securing that—
  • (a) any material obtained under the warrant is handed over to overseas authorities only if the requirements of subsection (2) are met, and
  • (b) copies of any such material are given to overseas authorities only if those requirements are met.
  • (2) The requirements of this subsection are met in the case of a warrant if it appears to the issuing authority that requirements corresponding to the requirements of section 129(2) and (5) will apply, to such extent (if any) as the issuing authority considers appropriate, in relation to any of the material which is handed over, or any copy of which is given, to the authorities in question.
  • (3) In this section—
  • copy” has the same meaning as in section 129;
  • “issuing authority” also has the same meaning as in that section;
  • overseas authorities” means authorities of a country or territory outside the United Kingdom.
131
  • (1) This section applies where an item subject to legal privilege which has been obtained under a targeted equipment interference warrant is retained, following its examination, for purposes other than the destruction of the item.
  • (2) The person to whom the warrant is addressed must inform the Investigatory Powers Commissioner of the retention of the item as soon as is reasonably practicable.
  • (3) Unless the Investigatory Powers Commissioner considers that subsection (5) applies to the item, the Commissioner must—
  • (a) direct that the item is destroyed, or
  • (b) impose one or more conditions as to the use or retention of that item.
  • (4) If the Investigatory Powers Commissioner considers that subsection (5) applies to the item, the Commissioner may nevertheless impose such conditions under subsection (3)(b) as the Commissioner considers necessary for the purpose of protecting the public interest in the confidentiality of items subject to legal privilege.
  • (5) This subsection applies to an item subject to legal privilege if—
  • (a) the public interest in retaining the item outweighs the public interest in the confidentiality of items subject to legal privilege, and
  • (b) retaining the item is necessary in the interests of national security or for the purpose of preventing death or significant injury.
  • (6) The Investigatory Powers Commissioner—
  • (a) may require an affected party to make representations about how the Commissioner should exercise any function under subsection (3), and
  • (b) must have regard to any such representations made by an affected party (whether or not as a result of a requirement imposed under paragraph (a)).
  • (7) Each of the following is an “affected party” for the purposes of subsection (6)—
  • (a) the issuing authority (within the meaning given by section 129(11));
  • (b) the person to whom the warrant is or was addressed.

Duty not to make unauthorised disclosures

132
  • (1) A person to whom this section applies must not make an unauthorised disclosure to another person.
  • (2) A person makes an unauthorised disclosure for the purposes of this section if—
  • (a) the person discloses any of the matters within subsection (4) in relation to a warrant under this Part, and
  • (b) the disclosure is not an excepted disclosure (see section 133).
  • (3) This section applies to the following persons—
  • (a) any person who may apply for a warrant under this Part;
  • (b) any person holding office under the Crown;
  • (c) any person employed by, or for the purposes of, a police force;
  • (d) any telecommunications operator;
  • (e) any person employed or engaged for the purposes of any business of a telecommunications operator;
  • (f) any person to whom any of the matters within subsection (4) have been disclosed in relation to a warrant under this Part.
  • (4) The matters referred to in subsection (2)(a) are—
  • (a) the existence or contents of the warrant;
  • (b) the details of the issue of the warrant or of any renewal or modification of the warrant;
  • (c) the existence or contents of any requirement to provide assistance in giving effect to the warrant;
  • (d) the steps taken in pursuance of the warrant or of any such requirement;
  • (e) any of the material obtained under the warrant in a form which identifies it as having been obtained under a warrant under this Part.

Section 132: meaning of “excepted disclosure”

133
  • (1) For the purposes of section 132, a disclosure made in relation to a warrant is an excepted disclosure if it falls within any of the Heads set out in—
  • (a) subsection (2) (disclosures authorised by warrant etc.);
  • (b) subsection (3) (oversight bodies);
  • (c) subsection (4) (legal proceedings);
  • (d) subsection (6) (disclosures of a general nature).
  • (2) Head 1 is—
  • (a) a disclosure authorised by the warrant;
  • (b) a disclosure authorised by the person to whom the warrant is or was addressed or under any arrangements made by that person for the purposes of this section;
  • (c) a disclosure authorised by the terms of any requirement to provide assistance in giving effect to the warrant (including any requirement for disclosure imposed by virtue of section 126(4)).
  • (3) Head 2 is—
  • (a) a disclosure made to, or authorised by, a Judicial Commissioner;
  • (b) a disclosure made to the Director General of the Independent Office for Police Conduct for the purposes of facilitating the carrying out of any of the Director General’s functions;
  • (ba) a disclosure made to the Service Police Complaints Commissioner for the purposes of facilitating the carrying out of any of the Commissioner’s functions;
  • (c) a disclosure made to the Intelligence and Security Committee of Parliament for the purposes of facilitating the carrying out of any of its functions.
  • (4) Head 3 is—
  • (a) a disclosure made—
  • (i) in contemplation of, or in connection with, any legal proceedings, and
  • (ii) for the purposes of those proceedings;
  • (b) a disclosure made—
  • (i) by a professional legal adviser (“L”) to L's client or a representative of L's client, or
  • (ii) by L's client, or by a representative of L's client, to L,

in connection with the giving, by L to L's client, of advice about the effect of the provisions of this Part.

  • (5) But a disclosure within Head 3 is not an excepted disclosure if it is made with the intention of furthering a criminal purpose.
  • (6) Head 4 is—
  • (a) a disclosure which—
  • (i) is made by a telecommunications operator in accordance with a requirement imposed by regulations made by the Secretary of State, and
  • (ii) consists of statistical information of a description specified in the regulations;
  • (b) a disclosure of information that does not relate to any particular warrant under this Part but relates to such warrants in general.

Offence of making unauthorised disclosure

134
  • (1) A person commits an offence if—
  • (a) the person discloses any matter in breach of section 132(1), and
  • (b) the person knew that the disclosure was in breach of that section.
  • (2) A person who is guilty of an offence under this section is liable—
  • (a) on summary conviction in England and Wales—
  • (i) to imprisonment for a term not exceeding the general limit in a magistrates’ court (or 6 months, if the offence was committed before 2 May 2022), or
  • (ii) to a fine,

or to both;

  • (b) on summary conviction in Scotland—
  • (i) to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 12 months, or
  • (ii) to a fine not exceeding the statutory maximum,

or to both;

  • (c) on summary conviction in Northern Ireland—
  • (i) to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 6 months, or
  • (ii) to a fine not exceeding the statutory maximum,

or to both;

  • (d) on conviction on indictment, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 5 years or to a fine, or to both.
  • (3) In proceedings against any person for an offence under this section in respect of any disclosure, it is a defence for the person to show that the person could not reasonably have been expected, after first becoming aware of the matter disclosed, to take steps to prevent the disclosure.

Part 5: interpretation

135
  • (1) In this Part—
  • communication” includes—anything comprising speech, music, sounds, visual images or data of any description, andsignals serving either for the impartation of anything between persons, between a person and a thing or between things or for the actuation or control of any apparatus;
  • equipment” means equipment producing electromagnetic, acoustic or other emissions or any device capable of being used in connection with such equipment;
  • equipment data” has the meaning given by section 100;
  • private information” includes information relating to a person's private or family life;
  • protected material”, in relation to a targeted examination warrant, has the meaning given by section 99(9);
  • senior official” means—in the case of a targeted equipment interference warrant which is or may be issued by the Secretary of State or a law enforcement chief, or in the case of a targeted examination warrant which is or may be issued by the Secretary of State, a member of the Senior Civil Service or a member of the Senior Management Structure of Her Majesty's Diplomatic Service;in the case of a targeted equipment interference warrant or a targeted examination warrant which is or may be issued by the Scottish Ministers, a member of the staff of the Scottish Administration who is a member of the Senior Civil Service;
  • targeted examination warrant” has the meaning given by section 99(9).
  • (2) See also—
  • section 261 (telecommunications definitions),
  • section 263 (general definitions),
  • section 264 (general definitions: “journalistic material” etc.),
  • section 265 (index of defined expressions).

Part 6 — Bulk warrants

CHAPTER 1 — Bulk interception warrants

Bulk interception warrants

Bulk interception warrants

136
  • (1) For the purposes of this Act a “bulk interception warrant” is a warrant issued under this Chapter which meets conditions A and B.
  • (2) Condition A is that the main purpose of the warrant is one or more of the following—
  • (a) the interception of overseas-related communications (see subsection (3));
  • (b) the obtaining of secondary data from such communications (see section 137).
  • (3) In this Chapter “overseas-related communications” means—
  • (a) communications sent by individuals who are outside the British Islands, or
  • (b) communications received by individuals who are outside the British Islands.
  • (4) Condition B is that the warrant authorises or requires the person to whom it is addressed to secure, by any conduct described in the warrant, any one or more of the following activities—
  • (a) the interception, in the course of their transmission by means of a telecommunication system, of communications described in the warrant;
  • (b) the obtaining of secondary data from communications transmitted by means of such a system and described in the warrant;
  • (c) the selection for examination, in any manner described in the warrant, of intercepted content or secondary data obtained under the warrant;
  • (d) the disclosure, in any manner described in the warrant, of anything obtained under the warrant to the person to whom the warrant is addressed or to any person acting on that person's behalf.
  • (5) A bulk interception warrant also authorises the following conduct (in addition to the conduct described in the warrant)—
  • (a) any conduct which it is necessary to undertake in order to do what is expressly authorised or required by the warrant, including—
  • (i) the interception of communications not described in the warrant, and
  • (ii) conduct for obtaining secondary data from such communications;
  • (b) conduct by any person which is conduct in pursuance of a requirement imposed by or on behalf of the person to whom the warrant is addressed to be provided with assistance in giving effect to the warrant;
  • (c) any conduct for obtaining related systems data from any telecommunications operator.
  • (6) For the purposes of subsection (5)(c)—
  • related systems data”, in relation to a warrant, means systems data relating to a relevant communication or to the sender or recipient, or intended recipient, of a relevant communication (whether or not a person), and
  • relevant communication”, in relation to a warrant, means—any communication intercepted in accordance with the warrant in the course of its transmission by means of a telecommunication system, orany communication from which secondary data is obtained under the warrant.

Obtaining secondary data

137
  • (1) This section has effect for the purposes of this Chapter.
  • (2) References to obtaining secondary data from a communication transmitted by means of a telecommunication system are references to obtaining such data—
  • (a) while the communication is being transmitted, or
  • (b) at any time when the communication is stored in or by the system (whether before or after its transmission),

and references to secondary data obtained under a bulk interception warrant are to be read accordingly.

  • (3) “Secondary data”, in relation to a communication transmitted by means of a telecommunication system, means any data falling within subsection (4) or (5).
  • (4) The data falling within this subsection is systems data which is comprised in, included as part of, attached to or logically associated with the communication (whether by the sender or otherwise).
  • (5) The data falling within this subsection is identifying data which—
  • (a) is comprised in, included as part of, attached to or logically associated with the communication (whether by the sender or otherwise),
  • (b) is capable of being logically separated from the remainder of the communication, and
  • (c) if it were so separated, would not reveal anything of what might reasonably be considered to be the meaning (if any) of the communication, disregarding any meaning arising from the fact of the communication or from any data relating to the transmission of the communication.
  • (6) For the meaning of “systems data” and “identifying data”, see section 263.

Power to issue bulk interception warrants

138
  • (1) The Secretary of State may, on an application made by or on behalf of the head of an intelligence service, issue a bulk interception warrant if—
  • (a) the Secretary of State considers that the main purpose of the warrant is one or more of the following—
  • (i) the interception of overseas-related communications, and
  • (ii) the obtaining of secondary data from such communications,
  • (b) the Secretary of State considers that the warrant is necessary—
  • (i) in the interests of national security, or
  • (ii) on that ground and on any other grounds falling within subsection (2),
  • (c) the Secretary of State considers that the conduct authorised by the warrant is proportionate to what is sought to be achieved by that conduct,
  • (d) the Secretary of State considers that—
  • (i) each of the specified operational purposes (see section 142) is a purpose for which the examination of intercepted content or secondary data obtained under the warrant is or may be necessary, and
  • (ii) the examination of intercepted content or secondary data for each such purpose is necessary on any of the grounds on which the Secretary of State considers the warrant to be necessary,
  • (e) the Secretary of State considers that satisfactory arrangements made for the purposes of sections 150 and 151 (safeguards relating to disclosure etc.) are in force in relation to the warrant,
  • (f) in a case where the Secretary of State considers that a telecommunications operator outside the United Kingdom is likely to be required to provide assistance in giving effect to the warrant if it is issued, the Secretary of State has complied with section 139, and
  • (g) the decision to issue the warrant has been approved by a Judicial Commissioner.

For the meaning of “head of an intelligence service”, see section 263.

  • (2) A warrant is necessary on grounds falling within this subsection if it is necessary—
  • (a) for the purpose of preventing or detecting serious crime, or
  • (b) in the interests of the economic well-being of the United Kingdom so far as those interests are also relevant to the interests of national security (but see subsection (3)).
  • (3) A warrant may be considered necessary on the ground falling within subsection (2)(b) only if the information which it is considered necessary to obtain is information relating to the acts or intentions of persons outside the British Islands.
  • (4) A warrant may not be considered necessary in the interests of national security or on any other grounds falling within subsection (2) if it is considered necessary only for the purpose of gathering evidence for use in any legal proceedings.
  • (5) An application for the issue of a bulk interception warrant may only be made on behalf of the head of an intelligence service by a person holding office under the Crown.

Additional requirements in respect of warrants affecting overseas operators

139
  • (1) This section applies where—
  • (a) an application for a bulk interception warrant has been made, and
  • (b) the Secretary of State considers that a telecommunications operator outside the United Kingdom is likely to be required to provide assistance in giving effect to the warrant if it is issued.
  • (2) Before issuing the warrant, the Secretary of State must consult the operator.
  • (3) Before issuing the warrant, the Secretary of State must, among other matters, take into account—
  • (a) the likely benefits of the warrant,
  • (b) the likely number of users (if known) of any telecommunications service which is provided by the operator and to which the warrant relates,
  • (c) the technical feasibility of complying with any requirement that may be imposed on the operator to provide assistance in giving effect to the warrant,
  • (d) the likely cost of complying with any such requirement, and
  • (e) any other effect of the warrant on the operator.

Approval of warrants by Judicial Commissioners

140
  • (1) In deciding whether to approve a decision to issue a warrant under section 138, a Judicial Commissioner must review the Secretary of State's conclusions as to the following matters—
  • (a) whether the warrant is necessary as mentioned in subsection (1)(b) of that section,
  • (b) whether the conduct that would be authorised by the warrant is proportionate to what is sought to be achieved by that conduct,
  • (c) whether—
  • (i) each of the specified operational purposes (see section 142) is a purpose for which the examination of intercepted content or secondary data obtained under the warrant is or may be necessary, and
  • (ii) the examination of intercepted content or secondary data for each such purpose is necessary as mentioned in section 138(1)(d)(ii), and
  • (d) any matters taken into account in accordance with section 139.
  • (2) In doing so, the Judicial Commissioner must—
  • (a) apply the same principles as would be applied by a court on an application for judicial review, and
  • (b) consider the matters referred to in subsection (1) with a sufficient degree of care as to ensure that the Judicial Commissioner complies with the duties imposed by section 2 (general duties in relation to privacy).
  • (3) Where a Judicial Commissioner refuses to approve a decision to issue a warrant under section 138, the Judicial Commissioner must give the Secretary of State written reasons for the refusal.
  • (4) Where a Judicial Commissioner, other than the Investigatory Powers Commissioner, refuses to approve a decision to issue a warrant under section 138, the Secretary of State may ask the Investigatory Powers Commissioner to decide whether to approve the decision to issue the warrant.

Decisions to issue warrants to be taken personally by Secretary of State

141
  • (1) The decision to issue a bulk interception warrant must be taken personally by the Secretary of State.
  • (2) Before a bulk interception warrant is issued, it must be signed by the Secretary of State.

Requirements that must be met by warrants

142
  • (1) A bulk interception warrant must contain a provision stating that it is a bulk interception warrant.
  • (2) A bulk interception warrant must be addressed to the head of the intelligence service by whom, or on whose behalf, the application for the warrant was made.
  • (3) A bulk interception warrant must specify the operational purposes for which any intercepted content or secondary data obtained under the warrant may be selected for examination.
  • (4) The operational purposes specified in the warrant must be ones specified, in a list maintained by the heads of the intelligence services (“the list of operational purposes”), as purposes which they consider are operational purposes for which intercepted content or secondary data obtained under bulk interception warrants may be selected for examination.
  • (5) The warrant may, in particular, specify all of the operational purposes which, at the time the warrant is issued, are specified in the list of operational purposes.
  • (6) An operational purpose may be specified in the list of operational purposes only with the approval of the Secretary of State.
  • (7) The Secretary of State may give such approval only if satisfied that the operational purpose is specified in a greater level of detail than the descriptions contained in section 138(1)(b) or (2).
  • (8) At the end of each relevant three-month period the Secretary of State must give a copy of the list of operational purposes to the Intelligence and Security Committee of Parliament.
  • (9) In subsection (8) “relevant three-month period” means—
  • (a) the period of three months beginning with the day on which this section comes into force, and
  • (b) each successive period of three months.
  • (10) The Prime Minister must review the list of operational purposes at least once a year.
  • (11) In this Chapter “the specified operational purposes”, in relation to a bulk interception warrant, means the operational purposes specified in the warrant in accordance with this section.

Duration, modification and cancellation of warrants

Duration of warrants

143
  • (1) A bulk interception warrant (unless already cancelled) ceases to have effect at the end of the period of 6 months beginning with—
  • (a) the day on which the warrant was issued, or
  • (b) in the case of a warrant that has been renewed, the day after the day at the end of which the warrant would have ceased to have effect if it had not been renewed.
  • (2) For provision about the renewal of warrants, see section 144.

Renewal of warrants

144
  • (1) If the renewal conditions are met, a bulk interception warrant may be renewed, at any time during the renewal period, by an instrument issued by the Secretary of State.

This is subject to subsection (6).

  • (2) The renewal conditions are—
  • (a) that the Secretary of State considers that the warrant continues to be necessary—
  • (i) in the interests of national security, or
  • (ii) on that ground and on any other grounds falling within section 138(2),
  • (b) that the Secretary of State considers that the conduct that would be authorised by the renewed warrant continues to be proportionate to what is sought to be achieved by that conduct,
  • (c) that the Secretary of State considers that—
  • (i) each of the specified operational purposes (see section 142) is a purpose for which the examination of intercepted content or secondary data obtained under the warrant continues to be, or may be, necessary, and
  • (ii) the examination of intercepted content or secondary data for each such purpose continues to be necessary on any of the grounds on which the Secretary of State considers that the warrant continues to be necessary, and
  • (d) that the decision to renew the warrant has been approved by a Judicial Commissioner.
  • (3) “The renewal period” means the period of 30 days ending with the day at the end of which the warrant would otherwise cease to have effect.
  • (4) The decision to renew a bulk interception warrant must be taken personally by the Secretary of State, and the instrument renewing the warrant must be signed by the Secretary of State.
  • (5) Section 140 (approval of warrants by Judicial Commissioners) applies in relation to a decision to renew a bulk interception warrant as it applies in relation to a decision to issue a bulk interception warrant, but with the omission of paragraph (d) of subsection (1).

This is subject to subsection (6).

  • (6) In the case of the renewal of a bulk interception warrant that has been modified so that it no longer authorises or requires the interception of communications or the obtaining of secondary data—
  • (a) the renewal condition in subsection (2)(a) is to be disregarded,
  • (b) the reference in subsection (2)(c)(ii) to the grounds on which the Secretary of State considers the warrant to be necessary is to be read as a reference to any grounds falling within section 138(1)(b) or (2), and
  • (c) section 140 has effect as if—
  • (i) paragraph (a) of subsection (1) were omitted, and
  • (ii) the reference in subsection (1)(c)(ii) to the grounds on which the Secretary of State considers the warrant to be necessary were a reference to any grounds falling within section 138(1)(b) or (2).

Modification of warrants

145
  • (1) The provisions of a bulk interception warrant may be modified at any time by an instrument issued by the person making the modification.
  • (2) The only modifications that may be made under this section are—
  • (a) adding, varying or removing any operational purpose specified in the warrant as a purpose for which any intercepted content or secondary data obtained under the warrant may be selected for examination, and
  • (b) providing that the warrant no longer authorises or requires (to the extent that it did so previously)—
  • (i) the interception of any communications in the course of their transmission by means of a telecommunication system, or
  • (ii) the obtaining of any secondary data from communications transmitted by means of such a system.
  • (3) In this section—
  • (a) a modification adding or varying any operational purpose as mentioned in paragraph (a) of subsection (2) is referred to as a “major modification”, and
  • (b) any other modification within that subsection is referred to as a “minor modification”.
  • (4) A major modification—
  • (a) must be made by the Secretary of State, and
  • (b) may be made only if the Secretary of State considers that it is necessary on any of the grounds on which the Secretary of State considers the warrant to be necessary (see section 138(1)(b)).
  • (5) Except where the Secretary of State considers that there is an urgent need to make the modification, a major modification has effect only if the decision to make the modification is approved by a Judicial Commissioner.
  • (6) A minor modification may be made by—
  • (a) the Secretary of State, or
  • (b) a senior official acting on behalf of the Secretary of State.
  • (7) Where a minor modification is made by a senior official, the Secretary of State must be notified personally of the modification and the reasons for making it.
  • (8) If at any time a person mentioned in subsection (6) considers that any operational purpose specified in a warrant is no longer a purpose for which the examination of intercepted content or secondary data obtained under the warrant is or may be necessary, the person must modify the warrant by removing that operational purpose.
  • (9) The decision to modify the provisions of a warrant must be taken personally by the person making the modification, and the instrument making the modification must be signed by that person.

This is subject to subsection (10).

  • (10) If it is not reasonably practicable for an instrument making a major modification to be signed by the Secretary of State, the instrument may be signed by a senior official designated by the Secretary of State for that purpose.
  • (11) In such a case, the instrument making the modification must contain a statement that—
  • (a) it is not reasonably practicable for the instrument to be signed by the Secretary of State, and
  • (b) the Secretary of State has personally and expressly authorised the making of the modification.
  • (12) Despite section 136(2), the modification of a bulk interception warrant as mentioned in subsection (2)(b) above does not prevent the warrant from being a bulk interception warrant.
  • (13) Nothing in this section applies in relation to modifying the provisions of a warrant in a way which does not affect the conduct authorised or required by it.

Approval of major modifications by Judicial Commissioners

146
  • (1) In deciding whether to approve a decision to make a major modification of a bulk interception warrant, a Judicial Commissioner must review the Secretary of State's conclusions as to whether the modification is necessary on any of the grounds on which the Secretary of State considers the warrant to be necessary.
  • (2) In doing so, the Judicial Commissioner must—
  • (a) apply the same principles as would be applied by a court on an application for judicial review, and
  • (b) consider the matter referred to in subsection (1) with a sufficient degree of care as to ensure that the Judicial Commissioner complies with the duties imposed by section 2 (general duties in relation to privacy).
  • (3) Where a Judicial Commissioner refuses to approve a decision to make a major modification under section 145, the Judicial Commissioner must give the Secretary of State written reasons for the refusal.
  • (4) Where a Judicial Commissioner, other than the Investigatory Powers Commissioner, refuses to approve a decision to make a major modification under section 145, the Secretary of State may ask the Investigatory Powers Commissioner to decide whether to approve the decision to make the modification.

Approval of major modifications made in urgent cases

147
  • (1) This section applies where—
  • (a) the Secretary of State makes a major modification of a bulk interception warrant without the approval of a Judicial Commissioner, and
  • (b) the Secretary of State considered that there was an urgent need to make the modification.
  • (2) The Secretary of State must inform a Judicial Commissioner that the modification has been made.
  • (3) The Judicial Commissioner must, before the end of the relevant period—
  • (a) decide whether to approve the decision to make the modification, and
  • (b) notify the Secretary of State of the Judicial Commissioner's decision.

The relevant period” means the period ending with the third working day after the day on which the modification was made.

  • (4) If the Judicial Commissioner refuses to approve the decision to make the modification—
  • (a) the warrant (unless it no longer has effect) has effect as if the modification had not been made, and
  • (b) the person to whom the warrant is addressed must, so far as is reasonably practicable, secure that anything in the process of being done under the warrant by virtue of that modification stops as soon as possible,

and section 146(4) does not apply in relation to the refusal to approve the decision.

  • (5) Nothing in this section affects the lawfulness of—
  • (a) anything done under the warrant by virtue of the modification before the modification ceases to have effect;
  • (b) if anything is in the process of being done under the warrant by virtue of the modification when the modification ceases to have effect—
  • (i) anything done before that thing could be stopped, or
  • (ii) anything done which it is not reasonably practicable to stop.

Cancellation of warrants

148
  • (1) The Secretary of State, or a senior official acting on behalf of the Secretary of State, may cancel a bulk interception warrant at any time.
  • (2) If the Secretary of State, or a senior official acting on behalf of the Secretary of State, considers that any of the cancellation conditions are met in relation to a bulk interception warrant, the person must cancel the warrant.
  • (3) The cancellation conditions are—
  • (a) that the warrant is no longer necessary in the interests of national security;
  • (b) that the conduct authorised by the warrant is no longer proportionate to what is sought to be achieved by that conduct;
  • (c) that the examination of intercepted content or secondary data obtained under the warrant is no longer necessary for any of the specified operational purposes (see section 142).
  • (4) But the condition in subsection (3)(a) does not apply where the warrant has been modified so that it no longer authorises or requires the interception of communications or the obtaining of secondary data.
  • (5) Where a warrant is cancelled under this section, the person to whom the warrant was addressed must, so far as is reasonably practicable, secure that anything in the process of being done under the warrant stops as soon as possible.
  • (6) A warrant that has been cancelled under this section may not be renewed.

Implementation of warrants

Implementation of warrants

149
  • (1) In giving effect to a bulk interception warrant, the person to whom it is addressed (“the implementing authority”) may (in addition to acting alone) act through, or together with, such other persons as the implementing authority may require (whether under subsection (2) or otherwise) to provide the authority with assistance in giving effect to the warrant.
  • (2) For the purpose of requiring any person to provide assistance in relation to a bulk interception warrant, the implementing authority may—
  • (a) serve a copy of the warrant on any person who the implementing authority considers may be able to provide such assistance, or
  • (b) make arrangements for the service of a copy of the warrant on any such person.
  • (3) A copy of a warrant may be served under subsection (2) on a person outside the United Kingdom for the purpose of requiring the person to provide such assistance in the form of conduct outside the United Kingdom.
  • (4) For the purposes of this Act, the provision of assistance in giving effect to a bulk interception warrant includes any disclosure to the implementing authority, or to persons acting on behalf of the implementing authority, of anything obtained under the warrant.
  • (5) Sections 42 (service of warrants) and 43 (duty of operators to assist with implementation) apply in relation to a bulk interception warrant as they apply in relation to a targeted interception warrant.
  • (6) References in this section (and in sections 42 and 43 as they apply in relation to bulk interception warrants) to the service of a copy of a warrant include—
  • (a) the service of a copy of one or more schedules contained in the warrant with the omission of the remainder of the warrant, and
  • (b) the service of a copy of the warrant with the omission of any schedule contained in the warrant.

Restrictions on use or disclosure of material obtained under warrants etc.

Safeguards relating to retention and disclosure of material

150
  • (1) The Secretary of State must ensure, in relation to every bulk interception warrant, that arrangements are in force for securing—
  • (a) that the requirements of subsections (2) and (5) are met in relation to the material obtained under the warrant, and
  • (b) that the requirements of section 152 are met in relation to the intercepted content or secondary data obtained under the warrant.

This is subject to subsection (8).

  • (2) The requirements of this subsection are met in relation to the material obtained under a warrant if each of the following is limited to the minimum that is necessary for the authorised purposes (see subsection (3))—
  • (a) the number of persons to whom any of the material is disclosed or otherwise made available;
  • (b) the extent to which any of the material is disclosed or otherwise made available;
  • (c) the extent to which any of the material is copied;
  • (d) the number of copies that are made.
  • (3) For the purposes of subsection (2) something is necessary for the authorised purposes if, and only if—
  • (a) it is, or is likely to become, necessary in the interests of national security or on any other grounds falling within section 138(2),
  • (b) it is necessary for facilitating the carrying out of any functions under this Act of the Secretary of State, the Scottish Ministers or the head of the intelligence service to whom the warrant is or was addressed,
  • (c) it is necessary for facilitating the carrying out of any functions of the Judicial Commissioners or the Investigatory Powers Tribunal under or in relation to this Act,
  • (d) it is necessary to ensure that a person (“P”) who is conducting a criminal prosecution has the information P needs to determine what is required of P by P's duty to secure the fairness of the prosecution, or
  • (e) it is necessary for the performance of any duty imposed on any person by the Public Records Act 1958 or the Public Records Act (Northern Ireland) 1923.
  • (4) The arrangements for the time being in force under this section for securing that the requirements of subsection (2) are met in relation to the material obtained under the warrant must include arrangements for securing that every copy made of any of that material is stored, for so long as it is retained, in a secure manner.
  • (5) The requirements of this subsection are met in relation to the material obtained under a warrant if every copy made of any of that material (if not destroyed earlier) is destroyed as soon as there are no longer any relevant grounds for retaining it (see subsection (6)).
  • (6) For the purposes of subsection (5), there are no longer any relevant grounds for retaining a copy of any material if, and only if—
  • (a) its retention is not necessary, or not likely to become necessary, in the interests of national security or on any other grounds falling within section 138(2), and
  • (b) its retention is not necessary for any of the purposes mentioned in paragraphs (b) to (e) of subsection (3) above.
  • (7) Subsection (8) applies if—
  • (a) any material obtained under the warrant has been handed over to any overseas authorities, or
  • (b) a copy of any such material has been given to any overseas authorities.
  • (8) To the extent that the requirements of subsections (2) and (5) and section 152 relate to any of the material mentioned in subsection (7)(a), or to the copy mentioned in subsection (7)(b), the arrangements made for the purposes of this section are not required to secure that those requirements are met (see instead section 151).
  • (9) In this section—
  • copy”, in relation to material obtained under a warrant, means any of the following (whether or not in documentary form)—any copy, extract or summary of the material which identifies the material as having been obtained under the warrant, andany record which—refers to any interception or to the obtaining of any material, andis a record of the identities of the persons to or by whom the material was sent, or to whom the material relates,and “copied” is to be read accordingly;
  • overseas authorities” means authorities of a country or territory outside the United Kingdom.

Safeguards relating to disclosure of material overseas

151
  • (1) The Secretary of State must ensure, in relation to every bulk interception warrant, that arrangements are in force for securing that—
  • (a) any material obtained under the warrant is handed over to overseas authorities only if the requirements of subsection (2) are met, and
  • (b) copies of any such material are given to overseas authorities only if those requirements are met.
  • (2) The requirements of this subsection are met in the case of a warrant if it appears to the Secretary of State—
  • (a) that requirements corresponding to the requirements of section 150(2) and (5) and section 152 will apply, to such extent (if any) as the Secretary of State considers appropriate, in relation to any of the material which is handed over, or any copy of which is given, to the authorities in question, and
  • (b) that restrictions are in force which would prevent, to such extent (if any) as the Secretary of State considers appropriate, the doing of anything in, for the purposes of or in connection with any proceedings outside the United Kingdom which would result in a prohibited disclosure.
  • (3) In subsection (2)(b) “prohibited disclosure” means a disclosure which, if made in the United Kingdom, would breach the prohibition in section 56(1) (see section 156).
  • (4) In this section—
  • copy” has the same meaning as in section 150;
  • overseas authorities” means authorities of a country or territory outside the United Kingdom.

Safeguards relating to examination of material

152
  • (1) For the purposes of section 150 the requirements of this section are met in relation to the intercepted content and secondary data obtained under a warrant if—
  • (a) the selection of any of the intercepted content or secondary data for examination is carried out only for the specified purposes (see subsection (2)),
  • (b) the selection of any of the intercepted content or secondary data for examination is necessary and proportionate in all the circumstances, and
  • (c) the selection of any of the intercepted content for examination meets any of the selection conditions (see subsection (3)).
  • (2) The selection of intercepted content or secondary data for examination is carried out only for the specified purposes if the intercepted content or secondary data is selected for examination only so far as is necessary for the operational purposes specified in the warrant in accordance with section 142.

In this subsection “specified in the warrant” means specified in the warrant at the time of the selection of the intercepted content or secondary data for examination.

  • (3) The selection conditions referred to in subsection (1)(c) are—
  • (a) that the selection of the intercepted content for examination does not breach the prohibition in subsection (4);
  • (b) that the person to whom the warrant is addressed considers that the selection of the intercepted content for examination would not breach that prohibition;
  • (c) that the selection of the intercepted content for examination in breach of that prohibition is authorised by subsection (5);
  • (d) that the selection of the intercepted content for examination in breach of that prohibition is authorised by a targeted examination warrant issued under Chapter 1 of Part 2.
  • (4) The prohibition referred to in subsection (3)(a) is that intercepted content may not at any time be selected for examination if—
  • (a) any criteria used for the selection of the intercepted content for examination are referable to an individual known to be in the British Islands at that time, and
  • (b) the purpose of using those criteria is to identify the content of communications sent by, or intended for, that individual.

It does not matter for the purposes of this subsection whether the identity of the individual is known.

  • (5) The selection of intercepted content (“the relevant content”) for examination is authorised by this subsection if—
  • (a) criteria referable to an individual have been, or are being, used for the selection of intercepted content for examination in circumstances falling within subsection (3)(a) or (b),
  • (b) at any time it appears to the person to whom the warrant is addressed that there has been a relevant change of circumstances in relation to the individual (see subsection (6)) which would mean that the selection of the relevant content for examination would breach the prohibition in subsection (4),
  • (c) since that time, a written authorisation to examine the relevant content using those criteria has been given by a senior officer, and
  • (d) the selection of the relevant content for examination is made before the end of the permitted period (see subsection (7)).

Reading this document does not replace reading the official text published on legislation.gov.uk. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. We assume no responsibility for any inaccuracies arising from the conversion of the original CLML XML to this format.

This text is published under legislation.gov.uk's own terms of reuse, not a Legalize or public-domain licence. legislation.gov.uk
Open Government Licence v3.0 (attribution required)
© Crown and database right. Derived from content available under the Open Government Licence v3.0 from legislation.gov.uk.